Talk:Michael John Sheridan
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Bishop's portrait be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. Wikipedians in the following regions may be able to help:
|
External links modified (January 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Michael John Sheridan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070918030423/http://www.diocs.org/CPC/Corner/index.cfm to http://www.diocs.org/CPC/Corner/index.cfm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:07, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
citations 3 and 4
[edit]I think we should improve/fix citations three and four, which currently appear in the controversy section of this article. Citation 3 is just a url, it gives no bibliographic information and it appears the link is dead. Citation 4 goes to a 404, so that doesn't work either. Can we find better sources? Or should we just scrap the whole controversy section? Are these controversies worth noting in the article, it would be short without this section.
- Start-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class Catholicism articles
- Low-importance Catholicism articles
- WikiProject Catholicism articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Unknown-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Unknown-importance
- Start-Class Colorado articles
- Unknown-importance Colorado articles
- WikiProject Colorado articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Start-Class Missouri articles
- Unknown-importance Missouri articles
- Start-Class St. Louis articles
- Unknown-importance St. Louis articles
- Wikipedia requested images of religious leaders
- Wikipedia requested photographs in Colorado
- Wikipedia requested photographs in the United States