Talk:Capri Holdings

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Fashion Low‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Retailing Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Retailing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of retailing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RetailingWikipedia:WikiProject RetailingTemplate:WikiProject RetailingRetailing articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Retailing To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : SM Lanang Premier
Copyedit : Retailing in India
Expand : :- Please expand this project's list of articles. The subcategories of Category:Retailers is also an excellent starting point.
- Expand this project's image gallery page

- More articles for expansion: Automated retail, Big-box store, Chain store, Hypermarket, Store manager
NPOV : Retail loss prevention
Photo : Retail design
Stubs : Leakage (retail), Retail geography
Verify : Department store, Discount store, Retail clerk, Retail in the Republic of Ireland, Retail media, Retail software, Suggested retail price
Other : * Please add this project's banner {{WikiProject Retailing}} to retail-related talk pages. Also, bots can be utilized to automate this task.
- Also, add biographies to the articles list.

–When a task is completed, please remove it from the list.

Proposed merge with Michael Kors

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was to oppose merge, recommendation was given to focus the article on the company.

The brand and the person are essentially indistinguishable, as Kors markets stuff under his own name. Both can be amply covered in a single article, Michael Kors. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:07, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose merge. I believe it warrants its own page. It has a symbol on NASDAQ: [1], and several sources indicating notability, separate from designer: [2], what they did with counterfeits: [3], new store in London: [4], popularity among teens: [5], competitors: [6], [7], popularity: [8] Tinton5 (talk) 20:33, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose merge Michael Kors is an internationally recognized media personality with many media appearances and a great deal of charity work under his designer belt. He is distinguished from his brand. If his brand was or has been sold he would continue to exist as a distinct notable entity.. Is the case closed?Masterknighted (talk) 14:08, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I sure hope it is. Thanks for your input. They are two totally different entities it's not even funny, now that I really realize it. So many people (mostly young women) on the street, in the store, at school, work….anywhere, I see they have MK purses. I know that's not the best reason to provide, but.. Let's see if anyone else wants to chime in, and gain more discussion. This is a very low traffic article. Tinton5 (talk) 20:03, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose merge per Tinton5, but without expected expansion this article would probably deserve to be merged. Gareth E Kegg (talk) 23:13, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose merge - per above plus a brand with 500/2000 shops must be notable. DexDor^(talk) 05:29, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose merge per Tinton5, Masterknighted, and agree with Gareth E Kegg that expansion is needed. Edwardx (talk) 08:56, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose merge, details are listed in the separate section. Verbal.noun (talk) 17:02, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose merge, but this article is in need of an expansion. And, yes, per Tinton5 and Gareth E Kegg. Antique Rose — Drop me a line 21:29, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment neither supporting nor opposing merge; if the (brand) article does not get expanded fairly soon, indicating notability separate from the man, i would fully support the merge, as at this point the thing is such a stub it should be merged away. Cheers, Lindsay^Hello 08:32, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose merge. A public company is not the founder/main shareholder even if they share a name, he could sell out and have nothing to do with the company that carry his names (as many others did). I would think the article should be about the company (Michael Kors Holdings Limited) and not the brand. --DelftUser (talk) 17:30, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Suggestion

Hello all, the current article about the person has a significant share describing the activities of the entity and I suggest moving some of this content to the article about the company. The public company (Michael Kors Holdings Limited) has board of directors, management, employees and all the other major attributes of the NASDAQ listed enterprise and deserves an independent article with its own content. For instance, according the 10_K of the Michael Kors Holdings Limited, the CEO is John D. Idol and Mr Michael Kors is the Honorary Chairman, Chief Creative Officer and Director. The company CFO is Joseph B. Parsons, etc.

The article about Mr Michael Kors should include his biography and reasons for notability. News publications and annual filings from, for instance, google news aggregator, information on NASDAQ website and SEC filings, could help to expand both articles. Verbal.noun (talk) 17:10, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agree to include these. Since this page is expanded and continuing expansion, we should start to wrap up the merge proposal. Tinton5 (talk) 16:56, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Headquarters

There legal structure is complex, but their SEC filings cite their primary legal HQ as the British Virgin Islands, principal location of execs as London, and operational base as the U.S. Britishfinance (talk) 12:57, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]