Talk:Millennial pause

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk) 17:40, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(
)
  • ...   that millennials pause? Source: https://archive.today/20220916215908/https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2022/08/tiktok-gen-z-millennial-pause-parody/671069/
    • Reviewed: Translation Bureau
    • Comment:
      promoters, i am aiming for the quirky slot with this hook, in case it isn't clear. i'd prefer if the hook immediately before it is a bit shorter to make the unusual spacing more noticeable, but don't worry if you can't make that happen. (if you are confused as to why i am playing with the spacing, please read the article, or at least its lead.)
      reviewers, i am open to suggestions regarding where best to put the extraneous spacing, and how lengthy it should be. i decided to use three spaces because i know that many readers will not notice one extra space, and the point was to make readers notice the superfluous spacing, since that is the subject of the article. one alternative is to use a couple of extra dots in the ellipsis. one much more radical alternative (though also possibly less noticeable) would be to drop the ellipsis altogether, interpreting the other hooks as having been drafted by millennials. below is an approximation of how the hook may look in comparison with the one immediately above, shown at roughly the width it would appear on the main page.

following a longer hook:

following a shorter hook:

alt0a (with extra spacing before the bullet point):

alt0b (with extra spacing after the bullet point but before the ellipsis):

alt0c (with extra spacing after the "that"):

alt0d (with an ellllipsis):

alt0e (with no ellipsis):

alt0f (double ellipsis, added by Hameltion):

alt1 (with no ellipsis and uneven text):

alt1a (with no ellipsis and more subtle uneven text):

Created by dying (talk). Self-nominated at 22:59, 8 January 2023 (UTC). [added alt1. dying (talk) 04:15, 5 February 2023 (UTC)] [struck alt1 and added alt1a. dying (talk) 10:32, 10 March 2023 (UTC)][reply]

  • @Dying: Fun idea! Meets new and length requirements. Neutral and very cited, but I do have some suggestions to improve the article:
    • Dates would be very helpful – when was the term coined (and on what platform), when and how was it popularized?
      haha! oh, wow, i can't believe i didn't mention any dates at all. anyway, added. i think kathryn lindsay of the atlantic may have popularized the term, but i don't remember any reliable sources explicitly stating this, although many do reference her. dying (talk) 04:15, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • Clarify in the body what "some videos" means – mostly in social media posts? Is the pause largely noticed on TikTok/Instagram?
      my assumption is that the phenomenon shows up in a wide range of videos, as sources don't seem to state that it is restricted to social media (even though some state that awareness of it is going viral on social media). i'd conjecture that it is being more clearly noticed now because videos with such pauses, when uploaded to social media, can be more closely compared to videos without them. the source i provided above states that "as short-form video comes to Instagram (Reels), YouTube (Shorts), and Snapchat (Spotlight), the Millennial pause is becoming easier to spot", suggesting that it exists outside these videos as well. i've now added that observation to the article body to try to help clarify that it doesn't seem to be restricted to social media. dying (talk) 04:15, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • Also, and this is speculation by me, but lack of video editing seems to be a crucial but unstated element
      i agree that the lack of editing of many short-form videos posted on social media platforms may have been a contributing factor to the rise of the millennial pause, but i don't recall it being explicitly mentioned in any of the sources, so i didn't mention it myself. plenty of users of social media now state that, since they have become aware of it, they have been editing the pause out. i have found a recent source mentioning that the pause could be edited out, but it isn't, so i have added that to the article. (i am somewhat conflicted about adding this, since the source doesn't qualify the statement, e.g., only assert that it is often not edited out, but i attributed the statement in the article, so am assuming that mentioning this is okay.) dying (talk) 04:15, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • JC Chasez's pause is mentioned almost incidentally in the source, so the photo seems undue. Also, would be good to find a source that explicitly says the pause is not exclusively a millennial phenomenon if that's the case
      that's a valid point. thankfully, after some searching, i've now found another celebrity mentioned in a reliable source, and not only incidentially: jennifer coolidge! i have now substituted chasez for coolidge in the featured photos. dying (talk) 04:15, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • Helpful to mention in the photo caption that the term was coined in reference to TS
      i have added a footnote, as i think the caption is already longer than usual. dying (talk) 04:15, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • Referring to millennials as "older users" is pretty funny to me, maybe replace that phrase with "millennial users"? Or "users of the millennial generation and older" if that's what sources indicate
      at the time, i couldn't find any reliable sources that explicitly mentioned older generations exhibiting the pause, but it seems to be implied, which is why i tended to use the phrase "older users" instead of explicitly mentioning millennials whenever i was discussing people that exhibited the pause. (i think using the phrase "old users" might have been inappropriate, but when comparing millennials to zoomers, i assume using the phrase "older users" isn't too unusual.) however, i have now found a recent source referring to "'older than Gen Z' creators", so i've replaced one of the instances of "older users" with "people older than zoomers", and simply dropped the other instance. (i haven't used the term "millennial generation" in the article, so i didn't want to complicate the terminology used.) dying (talk) 04:15, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • Some sentences are difficult to follow. #Theory is particularly verbose/redundant, try saying the sentences out loud. Also, "cause some millennials to question whether they are becoming too old" could become something like "made some millennials notice that they are 'getting old'" (to introduce the point of view of the source)
      i tried making the theory section easier to understand. please let me know if i was successful.
      also, i'm not sure if i'm understanding the second part of your comment correctly, but i think most millennials noticed a long time ago that they were getting old. (presumably, many zoomers have too.) i think the issue is whether or not millennials are getting older than what they are comfortable identifying with. the wired article states that "[m]illennials, the first generation to be online as kids, are starting to feel like [they]'ve aged out", which seems to focus on the heart of the matter: many millennials identify as the first digital natives, so when it is clear that they may no longer be as native in the digital world as they had previously seen themselves, the cognitive dissonance is stressful and uncomfortable, and makes them wonder if they have become too old.[original research] (i don't think this experience applies to all millennials, but those that don't feel the cognitive dissonance aren't the ones complaining about it in reliable sources.) dying (talk) 04:15, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • Other recs: Include definition of millennial years in body of the article. Add publication dates to citations. Remove all uses of the word "celebrity"
      i had actually tried to avoid explicitly defining what a millennial is in the article lead or body, because definitions of the term vary widely and i thought mentioning the details would break the flow of the article. (i added a partial definition in a footnote to allow readers to synth for themselves that chasez is not a millennial.) after reading your comment, i can now see that the article can be confusing for someone wholly unfamiliar with the term, so i have tried to add a practical but noncommittal definition in the lead. please let me know if you think that doesn't work. dying (talk) 04:15, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hope that's not too much to ask in a DYK review! Not all the changes are necessary, but the first two bullets are kind of important context that's missing, otherwise almost ready to go. QPQ present. As for the hooks, I like alt0b but it also kind of looks like a typo. Added alt0f above, favorite I've thought of so far. Hameltion (talk, contribs) 04:52, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    thanks for the thorough review, Hameltion! apologies for taking so long and for being so verbose in my reply; i fall down a rabbit hole whenever i try to do research for this article.
    admittedly, i think i had been playing around with alt0f too, but had been worried that it might look too much like a copy-paste error. of course, they all look like errors, though. i had preferred using either alt0 or alt0b for months (yes, it took me a while to get around to writing the article), but i thought of alt0d about a day before the nomination, and it has been growing on me, so i don't know what to think. i've also now added alt1, based on the idea in alt0e and the recently described gen z shake, now mentioned in the article. i only thought of it recently, but it might be my favourite one now. what are your thoughts on alt1? dying (talk) 04:15, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Most edits look great! Article is much improved. Besides resolving the coatrack discussion below, just a few more thoughts: Jennifer Coolidge's TikTok is amazing, but it's still a random one-off use of the millennial pause – fine in the body, but suggest you use just one image (Taylor Swift). The Theory section is much better (much clearer), but still sort of wordy. Also, my suggestion to rewrite this sentence – "Becoming aware of the phenomenon has caused some millennials to question whether they are becoming too old" – wasn't about the content, it's just kind of stilted diction. As for the Millennials online section, it seems sort of arbitrary what's been included but I think it's mostly fine; it works to give context situating this particular generational behavior.
    For hooks, my preference is still the one I suggested (alt0f) but would not object to either alt0b or alt0d. Like the idea behind alt1 but it's pretty confusing without having read the article all the way to the bottom, and it first seemed to me like that SpongeBob meme which is not the connotation you're going for. Simple is better I think. Hameltion (talk, contribs) 17:15, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Also, and this is speculation by me, but lack of video editing seems to be a crucial but unstated element Couldn't agree more. Instructing actors to pause for a few seconds at the beginning of each take is one of the first things people learn to do when making any sort of edited content. I know the Atlantic article is only talking about off-the-cuff TikTok smartphone selfie cam stuff which usually doesn't get edited, but it seems like a glaring omission. The lead of this article reads to me like it's telling the reader "if you don't immediately start talking when hitting the record button you're oooold" which flies in the face of decades of conventional wisdom in film-making. DigitalIceAge (talk) 18:37, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    DigitalIceAge, i actually didn't get the impression that lindsay's article in the atlantic was only talking about short-form videos on tiktok, so i didn't qualify the definition in the article. i mentioned a bit more about lack of editing in my response to Hameltion above, which i hope will address your concerns.
    your take on the lead is really interesting, as i personally don't think that someone is "oooold" if they exhibit a millennial pause, so am admittedly rather surprised that the lead comes off that way to you. (i actually thought the reason you stated could be a more relevant factor, so am glad you brought it up, but i have yet to find any reliable sources that posit this theory.) what about the lead gives you that impression, and how do you think it should be changed?
    by the way, i noticed that you removed the digital divide article from the see also section, stating in your edit summary that it "does not apply, the camcorders/older smartphones millennials used which incurred a lag between the record button and start of the take were digital". before i had added that article to the see also section, i had checked to see if the term "digital divide", as it is used in wikipedia, was used to only refer to the divide between people with access to digital devices and those that did not, or if it was a broader term, also used to describe the divide between people familiar with different types of digital technology. looking through the digital divide article, i got the sense that the latter was the case, so i had felt that it was appropriate to include the article in the see also section. my reading of your edit summary leads me to believe that you think the former is the case. did you have a chance to look over the article? dying (talk) 04:15, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    It might just be a kneejerk reaction on my part (done a lot of shooting and editing video in the past) but the first two sentences paint too broad of a brush. The Atlantic article does specify short-form content as where it is most discernible ("Which is why, as short-form video comes to Instagram (Reels), YouTube (Shorts), and Snapchat (Spotlight), the Millennial pause is becoming easier to spot") so we should use that phrase instead of the vague "some recorded videos". Also the whole 'Millennials online' section reads like a coatrack for this supposed "Millennial Internet Era" that bears precious little relevance to the concept of "millennial pauses" (how is taking landscape photos 'millennial'?) and should be trimmed. And... the 'doggo' image/caption is totally irrelevant (millenials aren't dogs, they're not the ones using "adulting"!) and reads like it was written for meme fodder and just had to go... sorry. I get it's a jokey lighthearted topic, but we need to give appropriate weight to those kinds of navel-gazing asides as an encyclopedia. As for the digital divide, the article defines that concept as unequal access to digital tech. Pretty sure Taylor Swift and every millennial who ever uploaded a vlog in 2008 has the same access to TikTok as Gen Z does today. In fact, this article wouldn't exist if that weren't the case! DigitalIceAge (talk) 07:21, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Dying: hey, checking in. I think the Millennials online section could easily be cleaned up if each sentence made clear that the sources are doing the linking of the millennial pause to these other behaviors. That section's really the only thing left to resolve before promotion, which I want to do for this hook. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 14:52, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Hameltion and DigitalIceAge, thanks for being patient. apologies in advance for this monster wall of text.
    Hameltion, i hadn't thought about alt1's passing similarity to the spongebob meme, but you are right. i have toned it down a little in alt1a.[a]
    my reason for including more than one image of someone who has exhibited the millennial pause at the top of the article was to make more immediately clear that the pause is also attributed to people other than millennials. i had originally written the article assuming that the habit was considered neutral (although perhaps a sign of age, not unlike writing english in cursive), but have come to realize that some view it rather negatively, so i was a bit more careful when selecting coolidge to feature on the page. i presume that coolidge's use of the pause in her tiktok debut is viewed rather positively, as her pause was praised by the source as part of a "perfect TikTok", and i have a feeling that, considering how exaggerated the pause was and how the video appears to have been edited (there appears to be a cut around 31 seconds in), the pause may have been deliberate, or at least deliberately kept.[original research] from what i gather, you would probably think inappropriate the use of any example other than swift unless the cited source wrote in depth about that person's pause itself, correct? i just wanted to make sure, as it took a while for me to find coolidge's example, and i don't think i will be able to find any reliable source analyzing any one pause in depth (let alone one by someone other than a millennial) to replace the image of coolidge, given that the pause is short and is pretty much devoid of content by definition.[b]
    by the way, an ip editor has removed references to people exhibiting the pause that are not millennials, and has done so with a misleading edit summary ("relevant info added"). the same ip editor has apparently removed such references from the article before, and the misleading edit summary is making it difficult for me to assume good faith, but i wanted to check to confirm that i wasn't overlooking anything if i reverted the removal.
    regarding the stilted diction, admittedly, i have been told before that i can sound rather stilted, but unfortunately, i can't actually tell when this happens. i would be happy to rewrite anything you think needs work. with respect to the specific sentence you pointed out, does "After learning about the millennial pause, some millennials have asked themselves if they are becoming too old." sound less stilted?
    also, when you state that, in the section on millennials online, "each sentence [should] ma[ke] clear that the sources are doing the linking of the millennial pause to these other behaviors", do you mean that each sentence should explicitly state that the mentioned source discussed the millennial pause? i had noted this explicitly at the start of two of the paragraphs, and had been worried that being more explicit would make the wording sound too redundant,[c] but i can do so if you think it is necessary.[d]
    DigitalIceAge, i actually disagree with you regarding your opinion that "the first two sentences paint too broad of a brush". i previously stated that i went into more detail in my response to Hameltion, so am reproducing the relevant section below for your convenience.

    my assumption is that the phenomenon shows up in a wide range of videos, as sources don't seem to state that it is restricted to social media (even though some state that awareness of it is going viral on social media). i'd conjecture that it is being more clearly noticed now because videos with such pauses, when uploaded to social media, can be more closely compared to videos without them. the source i provided above states that "as short-form video comes to Instagram (Reels), YouTube (Shorts), and Snapchat (Spotlight), the Millennial pause is becoming easier to spot", suggesting that it exists outside these videos as well. i've now added that observation to the article body to try to help clarify that it doesn't seem to be restricted to social media.

    it is interesting that we are using the same statement from lindsay to support different points, but after viewing a bunch of videos illustrating examples of the millennial pause, i am pretty sure that the term is not restricted to short-form videos. that a phenomenon "is most discernible" under certain circumstances does not mean that the phenomenon only occurs in such circumstances.[e] i had also seen the term used to refer to a pause on a scripted television show, which is obviously both edited and not a short-form video. yes, i suppose this means that many of the videos you have shot in the past have millennial pauses, but i see nothing wrong with this; you presumably didn't shoot them to impress zoomers on tiktok anyway.
A photo of a doggo adulting, taken in landscape orientation, as it might appear on a phone app using portrait orientation
regarding your removal of the image which i've reproduced here, i'm terribly sorry, but i am having significant trouble understanding your statement that "millenials aren't dogs, they're not the ones using 'adulting'". i know that millennials aren't dogs, but are you stating that the image is irrelevant because dogs don't use the word "adulting"?[f] my point was to illustrate how the word "adulting" is used, not to show examples of people who use the word "adulting". the caption also reflects this: it states "doggo adulting", not "doggo using the word 'adulting'". using an image of a dog also allows the reader to understand that "adulting" is not solely used to describe millennials taking on adult responsibilities; the term can also be used for animals, such as dogs.
also, the caption wasn't "written for meme fodder", and i'm admittedly rather surprised (and somewhat flattered) that you think it was. i added the image because that section cried out to me like it deserved at least one illustration. although to us, presumably adept users of the internet, the included list of habits may require no explanation, i can easily imagine someone not as adept having trouble understanding that section. the image i ended up selecting was the best of the ones i had found on commons that illustrated multiple points.[g]
your question "how is taking landscape photos 'millennial'?" shows that i have failed to successfully illustrate why such photos are sometimes seen as an issue, so i thank you for raising this point. it is not the photos themselves that are troublesome; it is the fact that, when used in apps that are primarily designed for phones held in portrait orientation, the photos, as the toronto star puts it, "look like hot garbage".[h] i had described the practice as "posting photos taken in landscape orientation on Instagram" [emphasis added] to attempt to make it clear that it wasn't the taking of photos in landscape orientation that was considered cringey.
to better illustrate this, i think it would be great if commons had a screenshot of a photo in landscape orientation posted on one of these apps, but since i haven't been able to find one such image, i have tried simulating the effect using the {{multiple image}} template, as seen at right. does this better convey the point? i would also welcome suggestions for a rewording of the caption to make it sound less like it was "written for meme fodder". in any case, if Hameltion agrees with you and does not find it a helpful illustration, i will leave it out of the article.
regarding the digital divide article, i think the word "access", as used in the lead, is supposed to be interpreted broadly. the article mentions that "[t]here are manifold definitions of the digital divide", and that it "is more than just an access issue and cannot be alleviated merely by providing the necessary equipment".[i] i suspect that you may be operating with an older definition of the term, as i believe your argument may hold under one of these older definitions. however, i think you should note that the article explains that the term's definition has changed over time.

Previously, digital divide research was focused on accessibility to the Internet and Internet consumption. However, with an increasing amount of the population gaining access to the Internet, researchers are examining how people use the Internet to create content and what impact socioeconomics are having on user behavior.

to me, the millennial pause phenomenon falls squarely into the purview of the second sentence. again, though, if Hameltion doesn't see the connection, i will leave the link out. dying (talk) 10:32, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'll try to be brief; this has become more than too detailed for DYK and it's been slow moving for a while. Just did edits, restored erroneous removal of content, and took off coatrack tag - despite no change, I realize most of the sources are explicit elaborations of Kate Lindsay's original article, and you convinced me on wording. Also added "especially on TikTok" to the lead, which the sources seem to support, as does a quick google search. The Coolidge image doesn't bother much anymore, but agree with Digital not to include the image of the sheepdog, nor the See also link to Digital divide.
Overall the article is in a fine state () for DYK (though going straight to archive links in citations is a strange choice). Struck the least favorite hooks, still prefer my suggestion of alt0f, but alt0d is currently my next favorite. Also prefer that this hook follow another short hook, as requested up top. Any further extended discussion of content should probably go on the article talk page. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 15:10, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notes

  1. ^ as an alternative, i had been trying to figure out if it is possible to animate text on wikipedia, but i cannot seem to be able to define keyframes on wikipedia, which seems necessary for a lot of css animation.
  2. ^ i think swift is actually also similarly only mentioned in passing in many of the reliable sources. she is obviously not just mentioned in passing in the video credited with coining the phrase, but that video is short and is not a reliable source. the toronto star mentions two other millennials (and features one of them in the image at the top of the article), while dot.la mentions beto o'rourke, who was born in 1972.
  3. ^ also, there aren't many ways to rephrase "when discussing the millennial pause", so this section may end up sounding a bit repetitive.
  4. ^ regarding your comment about the selection "seem[ing] sort of arbitrary", most of the specific behaviours were chosen because they were repeatedly mentioned in reliable sources. some were added to attempt to improve the flow of the section, but admittedly it still feels like a potpourri, presumably because the set of habits associated with millennials also feels like a potpourri.
  5. ^ for example, bioluminescence may be most discernible at night, but it can certainly be exhibited during the day as well.
  6. ^ millennials are the ones using the word, so i am assuming that "they" does not refer to millennials.
  7. ^ i was originally trying to find an example of a use of boomerang, or of zoom to emphasize a point, but could not find anything suitable on commons. i had debated including another picture in portrait orientation to make the definition of the term "landscape orientation" more clear, but ended up deciding against it.
  8. ^ in contrast, about a decade ago, the "vertical video syndrome" meme had aimed to get people to use landscape orientation when recording videos on their phones, because videos recorded using portrait orientation looked terrible on sites like youtube.
  9. ^ i presume the word "access" here is to be interpreted narrowly, in order to be logically consistent with the lead.

undue template[edit]

FormalDude, in case you weren't aware, the appropriateness of the section has been discussed before, in the dyk nomination (transcluded above) as well as on wt:dyk [perm]. is there anything else you'd like to mention? dying (talk) 05:45, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I echo DigitalIceAge's concerns about WP:COATRACKING. ––FormalDude (talk) 06:21, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
FormalDude, have you examined the cited sources? virtually all of the reliable sources that discussed the millennial pause in depth also included a number of other online behaviours associated with millennials, so i thought it would be remiss of me not to mention them in the article.
i recognize that, without having studied the cited sources, a reader of the article may find the section undue. in fact, i had initially only briefly mentioned the pause's association with other millennial behaviours in my first draft of the article. however, after going through a lot more sources, i had found my draft lacking, which is why i had expanded on that aspect of the pause.
during the dyk review, a suggestion was made to make clear in each sentence of that section that the connection to the millennial pause was made in the cited source, but this was eventually not implemented because it would make the section sound too repetitive. would implementing this suggestion resolve your concerns? dying (talk) 07:00, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No, because not all the sources are primarily about the millennial pause, some only mention them trivially. And the two attributions are bizarre, quoting a non-notable journalist by their first name without mentioning the news organization they're with, as well as an email from a random tik-toker. Honestly I think the whole section needs to go, none of it belongs in this article. ––FormalDude (talk) 07:13, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
FormalDude, i recognize that not all the cited sources discuss the pause in depth; my use of "in depth" in my previous comment was meant as a qualifier, not a descriptor. by the way, i assume you meant "two of the attributions" rather than "the two attributions", as i mention a number of other sources in that section. which journalist is being quoted by their first name without mentioning the news organization that they work for? also, the quote from the e-mail you mentioned was reproduced in a number of sources, including the article in the atlantic that may have popularized the term "millennial pause", so i thought it was appropriate to include. the "random tik-toker" you mentioned, michael stevens, has received millions of views on tiktok for his imitations of millennial behaviour, the topic of that section, so i imagine that his opinion carries some weight there. (his words were also quoted on tiktok, but i admittedly did not keep track of when it was mentioned on the platform, since i was not planning on citing those videos anyway.) dying (talk) 08:11, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I see now it was using the journalist's last name, Lindsay, as she was already named earlier in the article. She doesn't really need to be named at all though since she is not notable. The attribution can just be to The Atlantic.
Multiple WP:SYNDICATED versions of the same source does not make the content more due.
Having views on TikTok does not make one an authority on millennial behavior. ––FormalDude (talk) 08:46, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
FormalDude, multiple reliable sources mentioned lindsay by name when discussing the millennial pause, which is why i chose to do the same in this article. (as i mentioned near the start of the discussion in the dyk nomination transcluded above, she appears to have popularized the term.) i had also noticed that lindsay was mentioned by name in other wikipedia articles, so had not considered this to be unusual. mentioning lindsay by name also makes it easier to note that lindsay herself is a millennial, which seems relevant to this article. in any case, considering that this article has received more scrutiny than most during the dyk review process, i find it surprising that you chose to raise this specific point, since i don't recall anyone else finding it an issue.
my decision on including the quote was not based on the quote being reproduced in syndicated sources. it was based on the quote being repeated in multiple independent sources that discussed the millennial pause, including the article in the atlantic that likely popularized the term.
michael stevens does not derive his authority on millennial behaviour specifically from having views on tiktok. it is derived from the fact that many people appear to have found his interpretation of millennial behaviour accurate, and that a reliable source has quoted stevens on the subject. dying (talk) 11:07, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This is getting a bit tedious. I don't care about the naming of Lindsay, that is a minor issue.
The main problem is that the section is undue and outside the scope of the topic. Unless you want to change the article to be about the online behavior of millennials, I don't think it should have this excess detail.
And please provide an RS that mentions the quote and is not a syndication of The Atlantic article, because I do not see any. ––FormalDude (talk) 12:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

english variety[edit]

Migfab008, i admittedly don't understand why you changed the spelling used in the article, in violation of mos:retain. as the pause is a phenomenon apparently based on the advancement of technology, and people worldwide record videos, i don't think the subject necessarily has strong ties to the united states. (in fact, i think quite a few of the earlier sources i had found discussing the phenomenon were based in australia.) the article also mentions how people outside of the anglosphere have been observing the millennial pause. dying (talk) 10:30, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Articles cited aren’t good sources[edit]

A large number of the articles cited only vaguely mention the “Millennial Pause”, and some of them don’t mention it at all. 2A02:C7F:5091:C600:E93B:C9EC:CFBA:114C (talk) 11:08, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agree TypowyLaman (talk) 12:07, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. I think this article should be considered for deletion. The sources are mostly opinion columns, dictionary definitions, and social media posts. None of these seem particularly high quality. Pauliexcluded (talk) 22:36, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Millennial_pause&oldid=1205684969"