Talk:Missionary Families of Christ

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Catholicism

Missionary Families of Christ is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Fair use rationale for Image:Trumpets sticker.jpg[edit]

Image:Trumpets sticker.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:57, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding nomenclature[edit]

The name of this article should be changed to Foundation for Family and Life, because the SEC has filed a cease and desist order to FFL to not use the CFC name.

Also, I am concerned that all of the information in this Wikipedia article has been copied and pasted from one of FFL's sites. There is no references in this article either.

CFCYFCSolid —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cfcyfcsolid (talk • contribs) 21:05, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can i ask why you want to remove this article? I honestly think you are making a big deal of this? so what if FFL has their own article with CFC on it.. Don't you want unity at the end? I believe the Bishops know that there are two CFCs now. We should be working together and not fighting one another. Whoyou219 (talk) 14:54, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Appalling bad article[edit]

This is an appalling bad article. It has little to do with an encyclopedia, and much to do with a sectional interest seeking to hijack wikipedia for its own ends. Much of it looks like a copyvio. --Tagishsimon (talk) 21:10, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]