Talk:Mississippi River

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mississippi River article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 730 days

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Mississippi River was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 11, 2006	Good article nominee	Not listed

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on May 8, 2004.

Minnesota Top‑importance

	Minnesota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rivers Top‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Arkansas / Iowa / Kentucky / Louisiana / Mississippi Top‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Arkansas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Arkansas (assessed as High-importance).
	Iowa portal This article is supported by WikiProject Iowa (assessed as Top-importance).
	Kentucky portal This article is supported by WikiProject Kentucky (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Louisiana portal This article is supported by WikiProject Louisiana (assessed as Top-importance).
	Mississippi portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mississippi (assessed as Top-importance).

Tennessee Top‑importance

	Tennessee portal Mississippi River is within the scope of WikiProject Tennessee, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Tennessee and related subjects in the Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, and even become a member. [Project Articles] • [Project Page] • [Project Talk] • [Assessment] • [Template Usage]TennesseeWikipedia:WikiProject TennesseeTemplate:WikiProject TennesseeTennessee articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Missouri Top‑importance

	Missouri portal This article is part of WikiProject Missouri, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Missouri. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MissouriWikipedia:WikiProject MissouriTemplate:WikiProject MissouriMissouri articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wisconsin Top‑importance

	Wisconsin portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Illinois Top‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Where is it located

English 2603:6010:C906:EF2C:B807:633D:20D8:E0C1 (talk) 00:32, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is located in Louisiana, Mississippi, Arkansas, Tennessee, Missouri, Kentucky, Illinois, Iowa, Wisconsin, and Minnesota. Lake Itasca is its source while its delta in in Louisiana. ✶Mitch199811✶ (talk) 19:08, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Image

I just noticed that the image for the river has changed a lot recently. I do not like the current one as it is quite blurry and would rather the night time one. While I may be a bit biased, many images of the Dubuque section of the river looks better than the current one and is in the daytime. ✶Mitch199811✶ (talk) 20:08, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Average Depth?

The section titled “Depth” includes the following passage:

“...the deepest part being Lake Pepin, which averages 20–32 feet (6–10 m) deep and has a maximum depth of 60 feet (18 m)”

It's meaningless to quote an average which spans an interval of varied depths. An average is a single number which is a function of a dataset of several numbers. For example, take the dataset {20, 24, 28, 30, 32}. The avereage of these data is (20 + 24 + 28 + 30 + 32)/5 = 26.8

The average is a single number, not a spectrum of many numbers. The real average depth of Lake Pepin is not truly given here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.102.143.101 (talk) 18:08, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Length and 2,340 miles (3,770 km) function

Convert function {convert|2340|mi|km} doesn't work precisely enough. It shows 3770 km.

With such converted length in km, Missouri river would be just a bit shorter as its convert function {convert|2341|mi|km} shows correct length 3767 km.

Better convert {convert|2340|mi|km} result would be 3766 km (3 767 464.94 metres). Mav1971 (talk) 12:06, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Editing needed

The "Outflow" section, specifically the "Mixing with salt water" subsection, needs some editing for flow and cohesion. -- Otr500 (talk) 16:28, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Course of river

User:Scooteristi added the following edit today:

As Pangaea began to break up about 95 million years ago, North America passed over a volcanic "hotspot" in the Earth's mantle (specifically, the Bermuda hotspot) that was undergoing a period of intense activity. The upwelling of magma from the hotspot forced the further uplift to a height of perhaps 2–3 km of part of the Appalachian-Ouachita range, forming an arch that blocked southbound water flows. The uplifted land quickly eroded and, as North America moved away from the hot spot and as the hotspot's activity declined, the crust beneath the embayment region cooled, contracted and subsided to a depth of 2.6 km, and around 80 million years ago the Reelfoot Rift formed a trough that was flooded by the Gulf of Mexico. As sea levels dropped, the Mississippi and other rivers extended their courses into the embayment, which gradually became filled with sediment with the Mississippi River at its center.^[1]^[2]

This doesn't make much sense to me, and I'm wondering if it's too technical or out-of-scope for the article. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:49, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Van Arsdale, Roy B.; Cox, Randel T. (January 2007). "The Mississippi's Curious Origins". Scientific American. Retrieved September 1, 2019.
^ Potter-McIntyre, Sally L.; Breeden, Jeremy R.; Malone, David H. (November 2018). "A Maastrichtian birth of the Ancestral Mississippi River system: Evidence from the U-Pb detrital zircon geochronology of the McNairy Sandstone, Illinois, USA". Cretaceous Research.

Divides west from east, south and Midwest?

This is incorrect. It divides east and west but both the south and Midwest are on both sides. Arkansas is on the west, and Iowa is on the west. Mississippi is in the east, and Illinois is on the east. Alexander R. Burton (talk) 17:54, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like that was added with this edit back in 2011 without a source. I'll rework the paragraph. —Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 20:10, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nature reserves

I miss the nature reserves like Wilderness Area , State parks und other Protected areas. Only the areas from the National Park Service are listed. Falkmart (talk) 09:07, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 15 January 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Change were to are in paragraph after basin features box. Applebana (talk) 09:56, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 21:18, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Old River Control Structure; Atchafalaya wording

The Old River Control Structure does not "allow" the Atchafalaya to be a major distributary, it prevents it from becoming the main distributary. Thermah (talk) 02:03, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Van Arsdale, Roy B.; Cox, Randel T. (January 2007). "The Mississippi's Curious Origins". Scientific American. Retrieved September 1, 2019.

[2] Potter-McIntyre, Sally L.; Breeden, Jeremy R.; Malone, David H. (November 2018). "A Maastrichtian birth of the Ancestral Mississippi River system: Evidence from the U-Pb detrital zircon geochronology of the McNairy Sandstone, Illinois, USA". Cretaceous Research.

[1]

[2]