This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard. If you are connected to one of the subjects of this article and need help, please see this page.
Natasha Vita-More is part of WikiProject Transhumanism, which aims to organize, expand, clean up, and guide Transhumanism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page for more details.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative Views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.
I'm failing to see the importance of this particular person; googling her name brings up page after page of ads. Where's the notability? RasputinAXP talkcontribs 05:42, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
As I've said before, I don't think an importance tag is necessary. However, I do think Natasha Vita-More deserves a Wikipedia article because she was a pioneer of the transhumanist movement. --Loremaster 17:40, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
Can you throw some links up? I'm not joking when I say I can't find anything that's not an ad. RasputinAXP talkcontribs 18:26, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
Honestly, considering that the "World Transhumanist Association" consists of a little over 5000 members, having such long bios of any of their "leaders" online is a bit dubious. The whole organization is a media invention, and the only reason they have such a large wikipedia footprint is that many of their disciples are heavy editors. 188.8.131.52 (talk) 11:26, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
How can Vita-More's occupation be classified, if not philosopher? Biologist? Activist? Businessperson? Anything else? Also, where is she from? Article doesn't refer to her nationality. Conscious 13:01, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
Artist from the United States of America. --Loremaster 20:49, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
Text contrary to Wikipedia policy - Biography of Living Persons
I have, for the third time, removed some text that is clearly against the policy due to being contentious and unsourced. If it appears again I will be asking for a page lock Hpengwyn 13:24, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
I wish someone could fix the footnote formatting for me. I've tried to just cut and paste, but it's not working for two of the references. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TomAdmirer (talk • contribs) 00:43, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Whomever keeps putting my my age, I will ask to kindly stop. You do not know when I was born, and unless you are my mother, and you are taking great liberties with my name for that matter. "Nancy Clark" was not my birth name on my birth certificate. My mother is still alive and anyone can ask her if you do not believe me.
The following Links in the External-Links-section are dead: Technoccult, La Spirale, MemeBox Future Blogger, Tin Foil Music — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.108.40.206 (talk) 21:48, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
How do we know TetrahedreX is a connected contributor?
Why was User:TetrahedreX added as a connected contributor? I don't see any evidence this editor is connected to the subject other than most of the user's contributions were of the subject. If there is not any evidence TetraedreX is connected then I recommend removing the template from the article because the few edits done by User:Natasha Vita-More do not justify the template stating "A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject." Waters.Justin (talk) 01:26, 14 February 2015 (UTC)