Jump to content

Talk:Nikolai Rimsky-Korsakov

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleNikolai Rimsky-Korsakov is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on March 18, 2010, and on August 29, 2017.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 23, 2009Good article nomineeListed
January 16, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
January 30, 2010Featured article candidatePromoted
On this day... A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on March 18, 2017.
Current status: Featured article

No Infobox

[edit]

Why is there no infobox for this page? It looks rather strange, compared to other figures' articles. NipponGinko (talk) 02:23, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

it is done now, it's kinda clunky the fact that it doesn't get info immediately from wikidata but oh well, just did it manually Antniomanso (talk) 21:28, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
got taken out :/ Antniomanso (talk) 10:31, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Probably because not only is it not required, it's not really needed. - SchroCat (talk) 10:42, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
well yeah they don’t really bring new information to the article, but i always found them super useful for the way they condensate important facts in the start of the article, for example on korsakov you have to scroll through his whole biography section just to find out where he died, unnecessary with a simple infobox Antniomanso (talk) 11:29, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure you can call much of what goes into an IB "important", in encyclopaedic terms, except the small amount that can also be seen in the opening line of the article. IBs tend to focus on trivia (and where someone dies is trivial in most instances). The example you added recently was stuff full of equally pointless little factoids that don't assist readers in gaining an understanding of the man, his work or his place in the development of music - the long list of non-notable relatives, for a start: how to they bring understanding to a reader? - SchroCat (talk) 11:48, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have to agree with SchroCat here - the proposal seems a detriment rather than a benefit. Nikkimaria (talk) 13:54, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
i added the IB based on the portuguese one, where it goes fetch all info directly from wikidata instead of manual entry, but ofc part of the information could have been ommited instead
and based on personal experience (and academic peers as well), the trivia facts prove themselves quite useful in IB format instead of even-the-short-intro format when one is researching through unmeasurable articles, as the trivia is in a very predictable and concise format Antniomanso (talk) 13:39, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I can't speak for Portuguese, but highlighting trivia doesn't seem like a positive. Nikkimaria (talk) 00:57, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]