Talk:Obi (sash)
Obi (sash) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
is red higher then black response
[edit]it depends, once you reach i think 4th or 5th degree black you switch to a red/white belt (as in red w/ white stripe) ill have a list soon-takku
I can provide images for both womens and mens obi if someone can help publish. I am yet to publish and do not wish to make a mistake.
Mark 14:28, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
I was just wondering if someone could find information on the exact measurements of a kimono obi? Someone else July 01, 2006
There is many types of obis
[edit]There are many types of obis, and they all are diffent sizes. This should be noted, there in not just one type of obi. I will get the list to wiki soon. with pictures —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sailorrikku (talk • contribs)
Is Red belt higher than Black belt?
[edit]I know red is worn by the teacher... so... would that mean they would be higher than say a black belt? The yare the teacher... or is red something different all together.
-G
About my recent massive edit
[edit]- it was originally written by me for the most parts, in Finnish
- it corresponds closely to the current Good Article fi:Obi
- it was translated by me as directly as I felt was reasonable
- there were some pieces of information that were not in the original Finnish version; I have inserted them into the article
- I believe it now answers many questions stated here in the discussion <:
- please contact me at fi:Keskustelu käyttäjästä:Pitke if there are any questions, suggestions or complaints
- I have personally added all the footnoted and references to the original Finnish article — no need to worry about correspondence
-- Pitke (talk) 19:49, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
WPJ Assessment Commentary
[edit]Terrific article overall. Requires some phrased explanations of some of the Japanese terms, and a once-over, perhaps by a non-contributing editor, to clean up minor grammar and stylistic flaws. When those are done, it should be a B, and probably a Good Article candidate. Boneyard90 (talk) 22:34, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Bunko Musubi
[edit]The knot styles section talks about the Chōchō musubi being a variation of the Bunko musubi, but no mention of the bunko musubi is made anywhere in the article. What is it? 142.26.194.190 (talk) 19:22, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Obi (sash). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120327182417/http://www.fukunet.or.jp/21c-hakataori/english/hakataori.html to http://www.fukunet.or.jp/21c-hakataori/english/hakataori.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090326233826/http://www.yoshinoantiques.com/kimono.html to http://www.yoshinoantiques.com/kimono.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090315082816/http://www.japanesekimono.com/childrens_kimono.htm to http://www.japanesekimono.com/childrens_kimono.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:03, 8 January 2018 (UTC)