Talk:Religion and HIV/AIDS

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Things this article needs (expansion)[edit]

  • Filling in the rest of the religions in the condom section
  • Something other than just Jerry Falwell in the origin section. Surely some other religious leader has said something about where AIDS came from. Including some who believe it's just a disease.
  • Comments from people who partially blame religious treatment of gay people for the AIDS crisis
  • A section about religious organisations working to help people living with AIDS

--Alynna (talk) 14:32, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Religion and HIV/AIDS. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:51, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

"more detail"[edit]

"The Church therefore promoted the concept of abstinence as the only morally viable course of a disagree with this position.[9] (more detail needed here)" Not only is more detail needed here, the sentence is utter gibberish as it stands - "course of a disagree with" means nothing in English. (talk) 16:49, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

I noticed this nonsense too. I can't seem to figure out what it may have said originally. I am going to remove the statement for now. Andrew. Z. Colvin • Talk 08:04, 9 August 2017 (UTC)