Talk:Rise up, Women (Emmeline Pankhurst statue)
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rise up, Women (Emmeline Pankhurst statue) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Page name
[edit]Odder, a good page. Shouldn't the name be Emmeline Pankhurst statue? Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 04:09, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Randy Kryn: The naming convention for articles on statues in Britain tends to be "Statue of X". See, e.g. Category:Statues in London and its subcategories. Ham II (talk) 12:48, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
- This particular statue has a formal title ("Rise up, women") - shouldn't that be the article title? Belbury (talk) 20:01, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Belbury WP:COMMONNAME suggests that article titles should be what is most commonly used in the sources, which I think will be Pankhurst's name. The search box in the current vector 2022 skin is clever and will take readers directly to this article if you type in "Rise up women", even without that phrase being a disambiguation page. Mikedt10 (talk) 18:07, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- This particular statue has a formal title ("Rise up, women") - shouldn't that be the article title? Belbury (talk) 20:01, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class Greater Manchester articles
- Low-importance Greater Manchester articles
- C-Class sculpture articles
- WikiProject Sculpture articles
- C-Class visual arts articles
- C-Class public art articles
- Public art articles
- WikiProject Visual arts articles
- C-Class Women's History articles
- Low-importance Women's History articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women's History articles