Jump to content

Talk:San Felipe de Jesús, Sonora

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Undiscussed move

[edit]

21:26, 19 December 2017‎ Paintspot talk contribs‎ 51 bytes +51‎ Paintspot moved page San Felipe de Jesús, Sonora to San Felipe de Jesús over redirect: Version without "Sonora" redirects here; primary topic. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:08, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 6 May 2019

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: There is consensus to move, and San Felipe de Jesús, Sonora is the most supported location per precedent with other Mexican places — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:22, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


San Felipe de JesúsSan Felipe de Jesús (place name) – The title should be a redirect to Philip of Jesus. 2001:DA8:201:3512:11E1:8C25:D58B:2BF9 (talk) 18:35, 6 May 2019 (UTC) --Relisting. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 20:42, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disregard; a village of 392 inhabitants is not going to be Primary of anything. And not per checking English-language book sources. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:02, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@BarrelProof: why not Sonora, as it was before the undiscussed move, per Category:Populated places in Sonora In ictu oculi (talk) 07:48, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Because the municipality (which has a separate article) is also in Sonora, and the town has the same name as the municipality, so they appear to need disambiguation from each other. —BarrelProof (talk) 08:06, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support San Felipe de Jesús, Sonora. It is standard practice per WP:MEXICO to use this form, not the (town)/(village) they use at US topics, see Gómez Palacio, Durango and Gómez Palacio Municipality. Although I have never comprehended why they are separated as one is within the other. © Tbhotch (en-2.5). 18:41, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.