Jump to content

Talk:SilverHawks

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Story

[edit]

The last paragraph of the "story" section seems more like someone's rant concerning the realism of cartoons then anything specifically relevant to the Silverhawks franchise and should be deleted. Obviously Wiki isn't the appropriate place for this (or any other) animated series to be singled out for a whole paragraph dedicated to pointing out it's various logistical flaws which are well within the characteristic norms of the genre. For crying out loud, it's a children's cartoon about super hero robot bird space rangers.

Overview: "25 Century?"

[edit]

In the pilot episode of Silverhawks, Commander StarGazer reports to Earth that Mon*Star escaped Penal Planet 10 at 13:00 intergalactic standard time on the 40th day of the year 2839. This indicates that Silverhawks was set in the 29th century.

Seasons

[edit]

I think the show lasted more than one season. I seem to recall that the show lasted long enough for them to add like a second generation of characters to the cast. Memory's a big fuzzy but they added maybe three new characters, one I seem to recall was a magician. I figure these new characters must have happened for the second season (or third) to sell more toys. Typical for cartoon shows based off toy lines. RepSchnell 23:30, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

First time I've heard of such a thing as a second season. Do you have any references to prove this point? It would be odd if true, because most syndicated shows during that time frame had usually a 65 episode season. The Toys may have been delayed during production, and it is noted that they had ended production pretty quickly. Hotwing is the magician, and he first appeared in episode "Hotwing Hits Limbo". Devilmanozzy (talk) 10:06, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Silverhawks Logo.jpg

[edit]

Image:Silverhawks Logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:27, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Silverhawks.jpg

[edit]

Image:Silverhawks.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 01:10, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

*coughing* RIPOFF

[edit]

How come there is NO mention of this show being a COMPLETE ripoff of Battle of the Planets, right down to the youngest memeber with a speaking problem? I mean come on, 5 memebers, one of which is a girl, all with wings fighting intergalactic forces, I belive even thier ship was similar. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.230.236.1 (talk) 21:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you watch the beginning of MegaZone 23 II, you will see the pinball machine being played. It has the Silverhawks logo and also the thundercats logo for a bumper. The pinball game looks like it is a Silverhawks pinball game. I was quite impressed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.7.24.84 (talk) 05:35, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was page moved. @harej 11:08, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Silverhawks → SilverHawks — Proper formatting. — Reisio (talk) 17:27, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this is an uncontroversial move, since several sources including IMDb spell the name without CamelCase. Please discuss below. Jafeluv (talk) 19:49, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
What're your several sources besides IMDb, which also formats ThunderCats incorrectly? There are only three kind of sad reference sources for this article: (1) a tiny blurb on tvshowsondvd.com, (2) the aforementioned imdb.com, and (3) tv.com, which uses both formats simultaneously. The logo...
File:Silverhawks Logo.jpg
...clearly has a capital 'H'. What's controversial? ¦ Reisio (talk) 02:03, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The Copper Kid(d)

[edit]

Not sure how to/ where to write about the spelling of his name. His name was spelled "Copper Kidd" in episode "One on One", as the names of the SilverHawks were listed in the scene when Stargazer deactivated Steelwill. Devilmanozzy (talk) 17:00, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Remake

[edit]

Many fans have probably seen the concept drawings from the failed attempt to make a modern version (following the recent remakes of several other '80s shows), but are there any official sources for addition to the article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.195.196.222 (talk) 18:09, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on SilverHawks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:07, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:51, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:SilverHawks&oldid=1210381092"