Talk:Stencyl
Appearance
This page was proposed for deletion by Piotrus (talk · contribs) on 20 February 2012 with the comment: no claim no notability, all but one source are self-reference - promotion/spam red flag It was contested by DotHectate (talk · contribs) on 2012-02-20 with the comment: The subject "has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" (per the requirements of Wikipedia:Notability) as visible in the EL and references. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Feedback request
[edit]I have requested feedback at Wikipedia:Help_desk#Requesting_general_review_by_non-creator_for_new_article for this new article. DotHectate (talk) 18:11, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
Future plans
[edit]Just some notes here for myself, a todo list of sorts...
- Other than categories the page is pretty much orphaned, need to link back to it from other, relevant pages.
- Request some formatting/appearance feedback for the page
There's probably more I'm forgetting right now... DotHectate (talk) 18:20, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class video game articles
- Low-importance video game articles
- Start-Class indie game articles
- Indie video game task force articles
- WikiProject Video games articles
- Start-Class Technology articles
- WikiProject Technology articles
- Start-Class software articles
- Unknown-importance software articles
- Start-Class software articles of Unknown-importance
- Start-Class Computing articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- All Software articles
- Start-Class computer graphics articles
- Unknown-importance computer graphics articles
- WikiProject Computer graphics articles