Jump to content

Talk:Superman Returns (video game)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I have edited the original article to sound less like an advertisement and removed the advert tag. Forteblast 18:18, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion of a Gamer

[edit]

In the tradition of other Superman games, this game has been poorly received by the majority of gaming magazines, and rightly so. It STINKS. At all costs, STAY AWAY!

Sorry dude

[edit]

It still sounds a hell lot like advertizing. Are the "eas" tiburcios going to use the same engine that they use for their madden games? This game will really suck. Right after you defeat a boss there's probably going to be someone shouting "touchdown" or some other bullshit because the eassholes will forget to remove that from their patheticaly overused engine.

What the hell are you talking about? If you could read, you would see that they used the Unreal engine.
What sort of misguided website or person edited the page to state that it uses the Unreal engine? If it used the Unreal engine, credit to Epic would be given on the box or in the game credits. In fact, the gameplay engine itself was wholly custom and designed internally at Tiburon. Graphics and input utilise Criterion's Renderware library, physics utilises the Havok library, and all else (streaming, visual effects, and audio) use proprietary internal libraries. --24.30.83.249 01:11, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedias not the place to be a fanboy. me > you 08:27, 5 August 2006 (UTC)Malik1[reply]


Whats with the fake entries here? The Flash as a villain? Playing as Eric Clapton?

i thought the second boss on warworlds

[edit]

name was Overcast(the guy that can grow). That is what it says in the game atleast.

Actually, it is "Overkhast". --24.30.83.249 01:13, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

POV and verifiability

[edit]

The section on Reception is full of POV statements and lacks any sources for what "critics" have been claiming. I'm removing it for now until someone can come up with something that meets Wikipedia standards. —scarecroe 17:41, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fix this page

[edit]

Someone really needs to make this page better. I can hardly understand any of it.

Fair use rationale for Image:Concept widstrt.jpg

[edit]

Image:Concept widstrt.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:33, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:SR VG BlueTights 04 thumb.jpg

[edit]

Image:SR VG BlueTights 04 thumb.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:09, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Sr-videogame-box.jpg

[edit]

Image:Sr-videogame-box.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:39, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Superman Returns (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:57, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Superman_Returns_(video_game)&oldid=1201590695"