A fact from Suzuka Mambo appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 November 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 16:32, October 28, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Equine, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of articles relating to horses, asses, zebras, hybrids, equine health, equine sports, etc. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at the barn.EquineWikipedia:WikiProject EquineTemplate:WikiProject Equineequine articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horse racing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Horse racing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Horse racingWikipedia:WikiProject Horse racingTemplate:WikiProject Horse racingHorse racing articles
I pinged User:Tigerboy1966 to take a look at this. In the meantime, definitely try to de-babelfish the grammar so it sounds more like native English. Also, format the two sources and make them into footnotes where appropriate. Montanabw(talk)03:16, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This page [3] used to have a full news archive going back to the 90's, which disappeared after a recent redesign (leaving a lot of dead links btw). Keep your eye on it as it might be restored.
Pinging Tigerboy1966 and Horsegeek: I went to the race record that is in English and used it to rewrite the racing history narrative. I ran some of the Japanese source through Google translate, which was almost useless, but did allow me to get the gist of what was in the Japanese sources, so I think the material they cite is verified, more or less (would be good for someone who actually understands Japanese to read the original sources, though). That said, (nod to Tigerboy) I know approximately zero about Japanese racing, so the article needs a copyedit between the source to see if some of these races are better known by the Romanic alphabet translation of their Japanese names or an English version - and link any races or tracks (nod to Horsegeek to see if you can resolve the redlinks). Rather a fun and quirky horse. Fun article. Might want to nominate it for DYK soon. (Horsegeek can without doing a review of others, because Horsegeek has fewer than 5 DYKs) Not sure of a good hook, but maybe Tigerboy can help with that. Montanabw(talk)06:21, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]