Talk:Tara Hunt

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 10, 2007	Articles for deletion	Deleted

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: Saskatchewan Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Saskatchewan.

Hi There

I've recreated this page, as Tara has proved herself to be notable enough to hold her own Wikipedia article ;). She's spoken at a multitude of conferences, writes a highly influential blog, and her book is being published and shipped this spring.

I dunno if this merits mention here...

There is a site that describes itself as a "wikipedia-killer".

It claims it has 1,000,000 original articles, contributed by 6,000 notable contributors. But, there are reports that the 6,000 contributors were unaware that they were being listed as contributors. If their works are available on the site, without their knowledge, that strongly implies (1) they are not original; (2) they have been plagarized.

Tara Hunt is listed as one of the contributors. Geo Swan (talk) 22:10, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nicole Schepker (2009-03-27). "Ulitzer to Pay 200% AdSense Revenue to Its Authors". Ulitzer. Archived from the original on 2009-04-07.
"Wikipedia killer' pilfers blogosphere, taunts bloggers: How to badmouth your way to free content". The Register. 2009-04-01.
"Sys-Con goes from bad to worse, launches Ulitzer, attacks community and content creators". 2009-04-01.

January 2010

Sections have been removed due to poor citations and overly contentious claims. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adrock31 (talk • contribs) 02:01, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The sentence User:Adrock31 deleted was:

Tara was instrumental in making BarCamp a worldwide phenomenon<ref name="SeattlePI05">{{cite web|url=http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/246392_geeks29.html|title=Latest in tech trends: 24-hour brain raves|last=Cook|first=John|date=2005-10-29 |work=Seattle Post-Intelligencer|accessdate=2008-11-04 }}</ref>, with events in over 30 countries in its first year.{{Citation needed|date=November 2008}}

I've re-added the first part of the sentence (as it was cited) and not the latter part (as it wasn't). If you don't like the reference or you think that there's some controversy about it, let's discuss it here first, ok? Dori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 02:27, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Citations seems to be misrepresented.

"Tara was instrumental in making BarCamp a worldwide phenomenon,[7]"

The cited article does not state that she was instrumental. She is described as someone who might participate in a certain conference.

"and has also played (and continues to play) a large part in the growth of the Coworking movement.[4][8]" Again citations seems to be misrepresented. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.91.86.167 (talk) 01:16, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. That first clause is not based at all on the cited source. MartinPoulter (talk) 20:14, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Needs updating

June 25th, she suggested an update via twitter (retrieved June 26th, 2011). The page also mentions none of her past entrepreneurship success or that she is an entrepreneur in her occupation and that she seems to have been part of 30 start ups and a well cited start up expert. [1] Aznph8playa2 (talk) 02:15, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What sources should be used? MartinPoulter (talk) 15:52, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

http://buyosphere.com/about/ and http://ca.linkedin.com/in/missrogue would probably be useful, but I'm not sure if they're appropriate for an encyclopedia article. http://www.randomhouse.com/author/84607/tara-hunt?sort=best_13wk_3month Would be find too, I'm sure. Aznph8playa2 (talk) 21:16, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Updated

I added some references, including fixing up a broken link. Seems like it is impartial and supported by references now. What else needs to be done? -- Ultrasaurus (talk) 01:12, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please use a different photo

The photo you are using of Ms. Hunt is all rights reserved. I am the photographer. Can you please remove it and find another photo? Thank you.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Laneh (talk • contribs) 14:39, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relevance of page

I am not primarily a Wikipedia contributor, so I am not aware of the policies in general. But in my opinion, there does not appear to be any true relevance in Tara's content, apart from the startup/entrepreneurship talks.

Citations tend to be generally quite vague, and the actual content is not always clear. I don't know, but I am not sure this is worth a page. 37.162.60.105 (talk) 19:53, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]