Jump to content

Talk:The IIconics

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Orphaned references in Billie Kay and Peyton Royce

[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Billie Kay and Peyton Royce's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "NXT23/11/16":

  • From Peyton Royce: Richard, Trionfo (November 23, 2016). "WWE NXT REPORT: MATCHES FROM TORONTO, COMMENTS FROM PARTICIPANTS AT TAKEOVER, AND THE REMATCH HAS BEEN ANNOUNCED". PWInsider. Retrieved November 25, 2016.
  • From Billie Kay: Richard, Trionfo (23 November 2016). "WWE NXT REPORT: MATCHES FROM TORONTO, COMMENTS FROM PARTICIPANTS AT TAKEOVER, AND THE REMATCH HAS BEEN ANNOUNCED". PWInsider. Retrieved 25 November 2016.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 10:04, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Billie Kay and Peyton Royce

[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Billie Kay and Peyton Royce's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "WWE NXT 12/9/15 results":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 19:47, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in The IIconics

[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of The IIconics's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "OWW":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 10:48, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 31 October 2021

[edit]

The IInspiration -> The IIconics. Don’t see why this was moved, as WP:COMMONNAME plays an impact in this, so it should still be the IIconics. PedigreeWWEFigz87V2 (talk) 14:43, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move November 6 2022

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (non-admin closure) Adumbrativus (talk) 04:12, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


IInspirationThe IIconics – The team had more exposure as The IIconics in WWE, rather than their time with Impact. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 16:01, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In WWE, they had global exposure as The IIconics, including a title victory at WrestleMania. Their 4 years in the largest promotion in the world is more notable than her one year with Impact HHH Pedrigree (talk) 11:11, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.