This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.
I will be picking up the review of this article. MPJ-DK 04:30, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
The tool checks out okay on all external links so that's in order Y
Copyright violation tool
Seem to be okay, it hit on quotes etc. but nothing to worry about Y
I don't like seeing GAs with just one lead paragraph, I think we should always strive towards the best possible lead and this just feels short
I expanded the lead a bit more. GamerPro64 00:58, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Related - honestly the article seems short too, I read through it and then sat there and was like "is that it"? The reception part is longer than the Gameplay and Development section combined, that imbalance is problematic for me, makes it more about what people thought of the game than the actual game itself.
Can't find much information on the development of the game. But I did expand the Gameplay section more, separating it in two sections. GamerPro64 18:52, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
The quote by Kasavin needs a direct source listed with it
Didn't notice I missed the sourcing. done. GamerPro64 04:22, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
I have been going over your changes. It does help the balance a bit. I will continue my review now. MPJ-DK 23:12, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
The two non-free images looks to have appropriate tags and explanations, there really are no "free" versions available and the free image of the Gameboy is appropriate too - No issues. MPJ-DK 23:14, 7 January 2017 (UTC)