Talk:Three Wolf Moon
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Three Wolf Moon article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article was nominated for deletion on 8 May 2010. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
Notable wearers
[edit]Kassem G is the least notable person I can think of. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.94.167.141 (talk) 02:00, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
- Actor Shayne Topp has a character named 'The Chosen'. The character wears the shirt and the character's motivations seem to be partly based on the reviews and symbolism of the shirt Amber.vanraak (talk) 19:08, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Irony
[edit]An anonymous editor disputes the usage ironical. Please note the reliable sources provided which both describe the Amazon reviews in this way. Q.E.D. Colonel Warden (talk) 22:10, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- Just because a BBC writer doesn't know what irony is doesn't make it valid. Alanis didn't know it either and yet had a hit song supposedly about irony (which is the only ironic thing about it). Please explain what's ironic about the SATIRCAL reviews? Do all OTHER shirts provide these powers and only this one doesn't?? Does this shirt make all women find you ugly and causes physical harm upon the wearer? All your "reliable sources" prove is that a lot of people don't have a clue about what irony actually is. --208.38.59.163 (talk) 23:00, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- Agreed that ironic is being used improperly, despite the source. M@$+[[@]] Ju ~ ♠ 07:09, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Irony (n.) an outcome of events contrary to what was, or might have been, expected. The use of the word "ironic" is okay. One wouldn't expect the reviews to be so preposterous and entertaining. Basically, ironic is being used as a synonym for surprising which is acceptable. Occamsrazorwit (talk) 03:39, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
Three Wolf Moon Shirt Day
[edit]Yo PD Thor, step off the undo sucka, three wolf moon shirt day is in effect.
Gdoliner (talk) 19:20, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Older than the Amazon reviews
[edit]This kind of "Wolf Shirt" review dates back to January 2006, at least. Hyqeom (talk) 14:39, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
- Seconded. Of course, it'd be original research to mention this, someone needs to find a blessed source to cite that mentions that link. Hobart (talk) 17:27, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
- Thirded. "Shapedoctor says...
I like this wolf shirt because wolves and shirts are shapes." Laughed hard, way before the Amazon version. Sad that the truth is little known. 00:12, 21 June 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2620:0:1000:110A:224:D7FF:FE9B:4C10 (talk)
ROFL: YOU made my day with this Wikipedia entry lol! That's what makes Wikipedia nowadays really useful: to give useless and unimportant crap information a stage. I say: wayne! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.148.31.189 (talk) 13:50, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Fourthed. "phazlay says...
Five stars for shizzle. I went from nerdy internet boy, to ladies man overnight. Thanks wolf sweater. " Et cetera. The original was http://www.birkoph.com/Wolf_tshirt.htm but that went dark, now you can only read about it secondarily. https://web.archive.org/web/20140826074531/http://www.birkoph.com/Wolf_tshirt.htm Sadly this was before internet memes were considered encyclopedia worthy. I believe all editors thinking as such were rounded up and killed in 2011. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2620:0:1000:147C:7:6F88:B48D:E1CE (talk) 22:27, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
No picture?
[edit]This seems like the kind of article that could really use a picture of what it's describing. Surely it would be justified here as fair use? Robofish (talk) 15:01, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
"2009 Called"
[edit]Another reference is an xkcd.com comic, "2009 Called". — Preceding unsigned comment added by JohnWSaundersIII (talk • contribs) 14:51, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
The Office
[edit]In the "Niagara pt 1" episode of The Office, Dwight is using this and Michael makes fun of him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eduardopadoan (talk • contribs) 03:27, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
Interesting triptpych of hares
[edit]Three hares 7&6=thirteen (☎) 00:02, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Three Wolf Moon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://store.valvesoftware.com/product.php?i=cp201
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:37, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Popular Culture Section?
[edit]Would it be productive to add a section on the shirts appearances in popular culture to the page? I'm not sure if the Parodies and Attributions section is functionally the same, or if there is a way to lump them into one section. Ell.here (talk) 05:34, 26 August 2023 (UTC)Ell.here (talk) 05:32, 26 August 2023 (UTC)