Talk:Thune (company)

A fact from Thune (company) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 November 2008, and was viewed approximately 610 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Norwegian manufacturing company Thune, started in 1815 as a blacksmith's workshop, later expanded to build agricultural machinery, turbines and locomotives?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2008/November.

Wikipedia

Norway

	Norway portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Trains: Locomotives Mid‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the Locomotives task force.

On 13 November 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Thune to Thune (company). The result of the discussion was moved.

Requested move 13 November 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. WP:SNOW move per consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 04:26, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thune → Thune (company)
Thune (disambiguation) → Thune

– With John Thune having just been elected Senate Majority Leader, it seems reasonable to re-examine whether there is a primary topic for this term. I would be comfortable with moving the current topic to a disambiguated title, or to its full name, Thunes Mekaniske Værksted A/S, which already redirects here. BD2412 T 19:37, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nomination. With eleven names listed under Thune (surname) and four entries under Thune#Places, it does not appear that the 19th century-20th century Norwegian manufacturer, which has an entry in three other Wikipedias, holds such an indelible place in history as to dwarf the combined notability of all the remaining entries. If preferred by consensus, I would also support the alternative option Thune → Thunes Mekaniske Værksted A/S, thus avoiding the use of parenthetical qualifier "(company)". —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 01:30, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It seems doubtful that the average reader ever strongly associated this term with the company, it was obviously a surname in Norway as it is in the English-speaking world. Google Books search seems to show mainly references to people. Requiring that readers looking for biographies here click two or three times is bad navigation, even regardless of any single one becoming more prominent. WikiNav for October already showed the hatnote as the main outgoing click destination, which is a fair bit suspect. (Support) I suppose we're here because the move does require a cleanup of about 40 incoming links from other articles, which isn't huge, but still non-trivial. --Joy (talk) 09:40, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support although it gets the most views of things called just "Thune" the views[[1]] have gone up recently which suggest people are looking for John however the company has only gone up a fraction of the views of John probably because of people using his full name or getting there via Google etc. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:53, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.