Talk:Torre Ejecutiva Pemex explosion
|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Torre Ejecutiva Pemex explosion article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
|A news item involving Torre Ejecutiva Pemex explosion was featured on Wikipedia's main page in the In the news section on 1 February 2013.|
|This page incorporates content from Explosión de la Torre Ejecutiva Pemex de 2013, a page hosted on another Wikimedia Foundation project. Please consult the history of the original page to see a list of its authors.|
From the Spanish article
I have added incident aftermath and timeline sections which are translated from the Spanish article. Can someone who knows how add the requisite template reflecting this? Thanks. μηδείς (talk) 19:36, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Timeline of poor references
- What are you talking about? Except for the one single line marked reference needed every item is either refd in the timeline or in the body already. μηδείς (talk) 22:19, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
I noticed that the article uses the word "tweet" and related terms to refer to Twitter posts. I feel that this is non-neutral in a subtle way -- to fully understand this article, you must accept Twitter's marketing terminology. I would prefer more descriptive terms like "Twitter post" or "Twitter message". Does anyone know if there are any style guidelines pertaining to this? 188.8.131.52 (talk) 04:37, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
- I understand what you mean, however most major media outlets use the word "tweet" as the accepted terminology for a post on Twitter. -- LuK3 (Talk) 05:32, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
So I'm hearing stories that authorities are withholding information that it was drug cartel related because it sheds light on the incompetence of the administrations "War on drugs". Any truth?
terrrible writing, awful article
this: "The building was completely evacuated in the minutes following the explosion. In the hours after the blast, about 30 people were reported to be trapped in debris, and searches continued into the next day, as Pemex CEO Emilio Lozoya said there were indications that some people remained under the rubble."
is contradictory the building was EITHER "completely evacuated in the minutes following the explosion" OR "In the hours after the blast, about 30 people were reported to be trapped in debris"]
COMPLETELY MISLEADING ARTICLE TITLE: The main tower was not involved at all
This article must be revised to change its present title, as the main building (Tower) was not involved at all in the explosion. It needs to refer to "Edificio B-2" as this was the building affected by the explosion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.108.40.206 (talk) 15:16, 6 February 2013 (UTC)