Jump to content

Talk:Tyntesfield

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleTyntesfield has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starTyntesfield is part of the National Trust properties in Somerset series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 30, 2014Good article nomineeListed
December 6, 2015Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Advertisement?

[edit]

I'm struggling to identify content which would warrant the addition of the Advertisement tag. I'd be grateful if User:Mean as custard could point out the specific grounds for concern, and I'll look to address them. KJP1 (talk) 09:09, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think if the "Visitor access" section was removed, then the Advertisement tag could also be removed. . . Mean as custard (talk) 10:48, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think a lot of that information is useful, although the bus routes do seem a bit extreme. I think we should remember WP:GAZETTEER. Perhaps it could just be trimmed down a bit? Martinevans123 (talk) 10:56, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Mean as custard/Martinevans123 - both very helpful, and fair, points. I agree it's overkill as it currently stands, but that some of the info has some encyclopaedic value. Let me try a trim and we can see what we think. KJP1 (talk) 11:16, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Mean as custard/Martinevans123 - sufficient? KJP1 (talk) 12:07, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure you could have cut any more! I would have probably left a little more. But no objections. Martinevans123 (talk) 12:24, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Seems reasonable to me. . .Mean as custard (talk) 12:41, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]