Talk:Unzipped (TV series)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Television: British / Episode coverage

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved: insufficient support. DrKiernan (talk) 16:26, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unzipped (TV series) → Unzipped – The TV show is clearly more notable than the documentary film, which has one source and that's it. As for the other two things on the disambiguation page, one article was deleted and the other never had an article. Unreal7 (talk) 19:53, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose—it's a disservice to readers to have to go to the wrong article first, just for the sake of applying this extremist primary topic rule. Tony (talk) 07:51, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think the film article should actually be deleted because it doesn't seem notable at all - ONLYTOPIC. Unreal7 (talk) 23:44, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - no indication that either subject is clearly the primary subject of the name. ~~In fact, the film is more currently in the public eye since it turns up on television fairly regularly while the TV series hasn't been on the air in many years.~~ FYI, the film clearly passes notability guidelines, having received reviews in multiple national publications including The New York Times. Buck Winston (talk) 19:39, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have stricken part of my comment since I was confusing this show with the old MTV show Undressed. Buck Winston (talk) 20:13, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support. This term has only two topics worth mentioning, so this is effectively a WP:TWODABS situation. That is to say, the one that gets more traffic should be primary. For July + August (before the Sept. 26 page move), the TV show got 5,738 page views (3,347 + 2391), while the film got 3,769 (1870 + 1899) I am at a loss to understand why DAB pages have such loyal fanbases. This DAB got 115 + 128 views for July + August, so I am not the only one who finds it useless. In some ways, functionality is improved when a DAB is moved to "Foo (disambiguation)", since that more clearly identifies what it is. Kauffner (talk) 04:35, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This argument seems based at least in part on recentism. It's very likely that a show that started its second series a week ago would get more traffic in the months leading up to its debut than a several years old film article. That doesn't strike me as a strong argument for primacy. Buck Winston (talk) 21:32, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - The stats do not prove anything other than recent attraction. Even Unzipped is also the title for one gay porn magazine, and the word has a definition long ago. --George Ho (talk) 00:13, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.