Talk:William G. Enloe
Appearance
William G. Enloe has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 20, 2018. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:William G. Enloe/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Gog the Mild (talk · contribs) 10:12, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): Densly referenced to a variety of good sources. c (OR): No evidence of OR. d (copyvio and plagiarism): All Earwig issues seem to be appropriately attributed quotes.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): Densly referenced to a variety of good sources. c (OR): No evidence of OR. d (copyvio and plagiarism): All Earwig issues seem to be appropriately attributed quotes.
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias: There is no evidence of bias and the article is presented with a NPOV.
- Fair representation without bias: There is no evidence of bias and the article is presented with a NPOV.
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): Two images, which is good for an article of this length. One is free use, the other has a persuasive argument as to why it is fair use. b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): Two images, which is good for an article of this length. One is free use, the other has a persuasive argument as to why it is fair use. b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail: A fine, densely referenced, well written short article. Easily meets the Good Article criteria. Gog the Mild (talk) 19:28, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: A fine, densely referenced, well written short article. Easily meets the Good Article criteria. Gog the Mild (talk) 19:28, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
- References: Grant, Hunter-Gault and Sharpe require publisher locations. Sharpe requires an ISBN.
- @Gog the Mild: Done. Sharpe already had an ISBN.
- Coverage: Is there not more (any) information on his parents, his siblings, what his wife/children did/do?
- Nothing of much use, it seems. His daughter was a kindergarten teacher and had some children of her own. I've added some other additional info I found on Enloe though.
- Pedantry: "Enloe, wanting to "avoid another Birmingham,"". The final comma should be after the quote marks.
- Done. -Indy beetle (talk) 18:32, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
- OK, if the sources aren't there, you can't say anything. Apologies about the ISBN. A great little article. Easily the least work I have had to do on a GA assessment. Well done. Gog the Mild (talk) 19:28, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
Potential sources
[edit]- [1] - From first VP of League of Municipalities to President, October 1960
- [2] - From President of League of Municipalities to a director, October 1961
- [3] - Protests about the movie Baby Doll in theaters
- [4] - Board of trustees, school of blind and deaf
- [5] - Creation of Raleigh Historical Sires Commission
-Indy beetle (talk) 04:13, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- [6] Motion Picture News
-Indy beetle (talk) 03:53, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
-Indy beetle (talk) 07:38, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
-Indy beetle (talk) 08:25, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
-Indy beetle (talk) 00:23, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
- [10] Integration of Chepl Hill movie theatre. -Indy beetle (talk) 08:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- History good articles
- GA-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- GA-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- GA-Class North Carolina articles
- Low-importance North Carolina articles
- WikiProject North Carolina articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- GA-Class biography articles
- GA-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Low-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- GA-Class Civil Rights Movement articles
- Low-importance Civil Rights Movement articles
- WikiProject Civil Rights Movement articles