Jump to content

Talk:Zhiar Ali

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Infobox

[edit]

Hey @Nikkimaria:! Can you explain why you removed the infobox which retreieves from Wikidata in this edit? I think it's better if it's sourced from Wikidata.--Épine (talk) 11:14, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you think that? The local version has more information. Nikkimaria (talk) 12:11, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nikkimaria, because they are sourced and some information is not even necessary to be present in the infobox. Épine (talk) 12:19, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
What information do you feel is not necessary? Nikkimaria (talk) 12:20, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nikkimaria, the only info not present in the Wikidata template are nationality, IPA transcription, and organizations. This information is already reflected in the lead and body of the article. I know infobox is to sum up the article, but that information is not important to be summed up. Épine (talk) 12:54, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Singer-songwriter?

[edit]

The lead mentions he is a singer-songwriter, but the article does not contain any information about his musical career. He does seem to have a presence on Reverbnation, can that be referred to in the article?--Folkloria (talk) 23:15, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Zhiar Ali/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: DimensionalFusion (talk · contribs) 17:54, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Article looks good to not quickfail, sooo I'm gonna get right into reviewing!

Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. Prose is clear and concise, easily understandable to a broad audience. SPaG appears to be broadly correct from what I could spot of it
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. The article meets MoS guidance for the lead section and layout, and all other MoS components
2. Verifiable with no original research:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. Article provides a references list which is formatted consistently within the article
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). The article uses reliable citations that back up claims.

Self Citation check: 1,3,5,7,14,15,16,36,64,65

2c. it contains no original research. All claims are cited inline
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. Other than the quote (which doesn't count), I don't see any copyvios present within the article
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. Article addresses the main aspects of the person in an appropriate detail.
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). Article does not go into unnecessary detail and is focused on the topic.
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. Article obeys NPOV, did not see any violations of it
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. Article does not change dramatically on a day to day basis.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. Images are tagged with copyright status
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. All images are captioned appropriately for their content and are relevent to the person
7. Overall assessment.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.