Template:Did you know nominations/All India Services Act, 1951
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Yoninah (talk) 19:35, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
5x expansion of copied text required, but not fulfilled
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
All India Services Act, 1951
[edit]
...that the All India Services Act, 1951, passed by the Parliament of India (pictured), created two All India Services, namely, the Indian Administrative Service (IAS), and the Indian Police Services, and provides for the provision for creation of three more?Source: The All India Services Act, 1951 (Act no. 61 of 1951) (PDF). Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India. October 29, 1951.ALT1:...that with the passing of the Government of India Act 1919, the Imperial Services, under the oversight of the Secretary of State for India, was split into two arms, the All India Services and Central Services...? Source: Goel, S.L.; Rajneesh, Shalini (2002). Public Personnel Administration : Theory and Practice. Foreword by Vasundhara Raje. Delhi: Deep and Deep Publications. ISBN 978-8176293952. OCLC 51300460ALT2:...In 1946, at Premier's Conference, then-Central Cabinet of India decided to form the Indian Administrative Service, based on the Imperial Civil Service, and the Indian Police Service, based on the Imperial Police...? Source: Baswan, B. S.; Barik, R. K.; Ali, Dr. Akber; Singh, Pankaj Kumar (2016). "To take a comprehensive look at the requirement of IAS officers over a longer time frame" (PDF). Department of Personnel and Training, Government of India. New Delhi: Indian Institute of Public AdministrationALT3:... that in 1857 Imperial Civil Service replaced Honorable East India Company's Civil Service as the highest civil service in British-ruled India...? Source Civil Service". The British Library. 8 June 2011.
- Comment: This is my first DYK nomination, hence, any and all critique would be welcome.
Created by SshibumXZ (talk). Self-nominated at 00:49, 18 February 2018 (UTC).
Article is new and long, but contents in the history section is copy-paste from Indian Administrative Service. It violates DYK rules. As the first nomination, I hope you will improve the article.Gfosankar (talk) 12:25, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
- @Gfosankar: oh, ok. How can I improve the article? I can make the body of the article to be more than 1,500 characters long, excluding the copied history section. Is there anything else which can be done?
Regards, SshibumXZ (Talk) (Contributions). 15:01, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
- COMMENT: The ALTs also have to include All India Services Act, 1951 If you cannot make those relate, strike out with
like this. You can paraphrase the history content rather than remove it entirely. If you want to submit an image with your DYK then need to include (pictured) in the DYK. David notMD (talk) 19:22, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
- @David notMD: will do that, then. Also, I have striked out Alts 1-3 and have changed the image.
- I inserted "(pictured)" Be aware that the DYK may be approved, but when advanced to the Prep/Queue stage, an Administrator may decide to not use the photo, as it does not directly pertain to the DYK article. I am sure that someone will start the review process soon. I feel that I am not qualified as I know very little about India. David notMD (talk) 16:47, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
- @David notMD: no worries. I'm eagerly waiting for an admin to review this one, though.
Regards, SshibumXZ (Talk) (Contributions). 19:19, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
- COMMENT: The ALTs also have to include All India Services Act, 1951 If you cannot make those relate, strike out with
- @Gfosankar: oh, ok. How can I improve the article? I can make the body of the article to be more than 1,500 characters long, excluding the copied history section. Is there anything else which can be done?
New reviewer needed. Please note that per DYK rules, any text copied from other Wikipedia articles needs to be 5× expanded. For example, if a 400 prose character chunk is reused, the article must be at least 2,000 prose character total, which is beyond the normal 1,500 prose character minimum for new articles. If it's 1,000 characters copied, then the article must be 5,000 characters, etc. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:59, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note that the original hook is too long at 256 characters; I'm condensing it below as ALT4 so it's below the maximum 200 characters at 186 (175 excluding "(pictured)":
- ALT4: ... that the All India Services Act, 1951, passed by the Parliament of India (pictured), created two All India Services, Administrative and Police, and allows for the creation of three more? —BlueMoonset (talk) 19:09, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
The article total is 2934 characters. 2090 characters was copied from Indian Administrative Service#history. According to the rules, the page would need to be 10000 characters long after a 5x expansion. As it's been awhile since it was submitted and is far away from reaching the 10000 mark, I have to fail this. Meanderingbartender (talk) 20:11, 4 April 2018 (UTC)