Template:Did you know nominations/Grakliani Hill

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:42, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Grakliani Hill[edit]

  • ... that Grakliani Hill reveals almost every layer of the human development through a continous 300,000 year chain?
  • ALT1:... that at Grakliani Hill there had been 300,000 years of non-stop human settlement?

Created by Tradereddy (talk). Self-nominated at 23:19, 8 September 2015 (UTC).

  • new enough, long enough, closed paragraphs and inline citations checks, interesting reading and factual. good 2 go.BabbaQ (talk) 13:23, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
I suggest using ALT1 hook.BabbaQ (talk) 13:24, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Reopened, see WT:DYK#Highly dubious and probably wrong hook removed from prep Fram (talk) 14:47, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

  • Given that the post on the DYK talk page casts very strong doubt on the 300,000 year claim, I've struck both hooks; a new one must be provided before this nomination can proceed. Also, the close paraphrasing and other issues noted must be addressed before we ask a new reviewer to check the new hook and revised article. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:32, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
Working on it. The site is still being explored, so it may take some time for new information to arise. I already incorporated an National Geographic article which did not exist at the time of article creation. Tradereddy (talk) 15:08, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
  • BlueMoonset, full review done and copy edits made. Long enough, no obvious plagiarism (though I welcome Fram's second opinion), etc. Mind you, I can't pass a hook cause there isn't one. Any hook worth its salt will mention the previously unknown script discovered on the altar of a seventh-century BC fertility goddess, predating the existing scripts from the area by a millennium. But I'm not going to propose that hook cause then I can't pass it, and after spending almost two hours making this article conform to various standards there is no way I am not going to count this for QPQ. So if anyone wants to propose a hook, go ahead and ping me. Drmies (talk) 01:56, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
  • I think Santa Claus came early this year: ALT2 approved. Drmies (talk) 14:28, 16 October 2015 (UTC)