Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/T.S.R. Subramanian vs Union of India

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:30, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

T.S.R. Subramanian vs Union of India

[edit]
Building of the Supreme Court of India.
Building of the Supreme Court of India.

Created by SshibumXZ (talk). Self-nominated at 05:31, 23 February 2018 (UTC).

  • @SshibumXZ: Congratulations on your first DYK nomination. The time is fine. However, excluding the information in the bullet points as they don't count towards character count, the article is only about 1,014 characters long but it can easily be changed into paragraphs. With the hooks, my preference is for the original however it is 294 characters, 94 characters too long so would you be able to find a way to reword it please? You don't need a QPQ as this is your first nomination. The image you have included with the hooks needs to be in the article in order for it to be used. When you have done all of these, please ping me and I will have another look. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 08:21, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
@The C of E:  Done, I have also added an extra alt. Also on a somewhat related note, why is a quid pro quo necessary for experienced nominators?
Regards, SshibumXZ (Talk) (Contributions). 23:38, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
@SshibumXZ: It's to help get DYKs reviewed in a relatively timely manner rather than just growing the list with few people reviewing them. I've found it interesting to review other entries here, myself. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 00:26, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
@Nihonjoe: oh, okay. Thank you for explaining.
Regards, SshibumXZ (Talk) (Contributions). 03:13, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
@SshibumXZ: Thank you for your work on it. I like ALT4 however it needs an inline citation in the article, preferably in the lead. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 07:42, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
@The C of E: I would do that later, as I have an extremely shoddy internet connection right now. Also, are you sure that you’re one of Elizabeth II’s subjects, because as far as I know, the sovereign doesn’t have subjects anymore, they’ve been replaced by citizens, and the only subjects left reside in Ireland.

@The C of E:  Done: I have added inline citations in the lede.
Regards, SshibumXZ (Talk) (Contributions). 00:34, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Good to go, though I would suggest changing "most important" to "a landmark" case. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 07:08, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
 Done: I have replaced 'most important' with 'landmark'.
Regards, SshibumXZ (Talk) (Contributions). 06:23, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
@The C of E: Coming to promote this, you seem to have approved ALT4, but that hook does not exist. Also, were you referring to using "landmark" in the hook rather than the article? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:25, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
@Cwmhiraeth: Apologies, I had meant to say ALt3. I have amended it in line with my comments above. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 08:19, 27 March 2018 (UTC)