Template:Did you know nominations/The Devil Never Sleeps
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Narutolovehinata5 (talk) 07:44, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
Article was not nominated within the seven days required for DYK, and there is consensus that a week-long delay was too long for an IAR exemption to be granted. No prejudice against renomination if the article is expanded 5x or brought to GA status.
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
The Devil Never Sleeps
- ... that the book The Devil Never Sleeps asserts that major events like Hurricane Katrina, and the January 6 Capitol attack could have been handled better if better preparation had been made? Source: "Nonfiction Book Review: The Devil Never Sleeps: Learning to Live in an Age of Disasters by Juliette Kayyem". Publishers Weekly. ISBN 978-1-5417-0009-3.
Created by Evrik (talk) and Steve Quinn (talk). Nominated by Evrik (talk) at 21:39, 31 March 2022 (UTC).
- review forthcoming
sorry I don't think this qualifies for DYK since it was created 17 March and nominated 31 March, therefore more than 7 days later. the 26 March move back to the original name would not have relevance Mujinga (talk) 11:13, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
I think a seven day extension is not unusual in this instance. --evrik (talk) 13:18, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
- Comment - @Evrik: Needs work. I don't personally have an issue with an extension of the 7 days rule, but suggest other editors comment here about that. I do think the format Wikipedia:WikiProject Books/Non-fiction article would be helpful. It could use expansion and sorting out what belongs in what category. — Maile (talk) 14:32, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Maile66: thanks for the tip. I added two new sections. --evrik (talk) 15:53, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Evrik: Looking much better now. Let's see what others thinks about your IAR question. — Maile (talk) 18:49, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
- hmmm... while I normally don't think twice about IAR exceptions on timing, that's usually for missing the deadline by one, two, three days. a whole week... i'm hesitant. Happy to bow to community consensus if others don't mind (also see not exactly), but it ain't my flagon of tea. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 20:01, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
- I think that more than a week is heavily pushing it. SL93 (talk) 22:53, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
- An article that is two weeks old is not eligible for DYK unless it achives GA status. I see no consensus to ignore all rules. Flibirigit (talk) 00:22, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
- I think that more than a week is heavily pushing it. SL93 (talk) 22:53, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
- hmmm... while I normally don't think twice about IAR exceptions on timing, that's usually for missing the deadline by one, two, three days. a whole week... i'm hesitant. Happy to bow to community consensus if others don't mind (also see not exactly), but it ain't my flagon of tea. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 20:01, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Evrik: Looking much better now. Let's see what others thinks about your IAR question. — Maile (talk) 18:49, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Maile66: thanks for the tip. I added two new sections. --evrik (talk) 15:53, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
- Comment - @Evrik: Needs work. I don't personally have an issue with an extension of the 7 days rule, but suggest other editors comment here about that. I do think the format Wikipedia:WikiProject Books/Non-fiction article would be helpful. It could use expansion and sorting out what belongs in what category. — Maile (talk) 14:32, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
