Talk:The Devil Never Sleeps

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Weather Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Environment Low‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disaster management Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Occupational Safety and Health Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to occupational safety and health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Occupational Safety and HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthTemplate:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthOccupational Safety and Health articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Narutolovehinata5 (talk) 07:44, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Article was not nominated within the seven days required for DYK, and there is consensus that a week-long delay was too long for an IAR exemption to be granted. No prejudice against renomination if the article is expanded 5x or brought to GA status.

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that the book The Devil Never Sleeps asserts that major events like Hurricane Katrina, and the January 6 Capitol attack could have been handled better if better preparation had been made? Source: "Nonfiction Book Review: The Devil Never Sleeps: Learning to Live in an Age of Disasters by Juliette Kayyem". Publishers Weekly. ISBN 978-1-5417-0009-3.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Cheshire Hall plantation

Created by Evrik (talk) and Steve Quinn (talk). Nominated by Evrik (talk) at 21:39, 31 March 2022 (UTC).[reply]

review forthcoming
sorry I don't think this qualifies for DYK since it was created 17 March and nominated 31 March, therefore more than 7 days later. the 26 March move back to the original name would not have relevance Mujinga (talk) 11:13, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- I think a seven day extension is not unusual in this instance. --evrik ^(talk) 13:18, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment - @Evrik: Needs work. I don't personally have an issue with an extension of the 7 days rule, but suggest other editors comment here about that. I do think the format Wikipedia:WikiProject Books/Non-fiction article would be helpful. It could use expansion and sorting out what belongs in what category. — Maile (talk) 14:32, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    - @Maile66: thanks for the tip. I added two new sections. --evrik ^(talk) 15:53, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      - @Evrik: Looking much better now. Let's see what others thinks about your IAR question. — Maile (talk) 18:49, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
        hmmm... while I normally don't think twice about IAR exceptions on timing, that's usually for missing the deadline by one, two, three days. a whole week... i'm hesitant. Happy to bow to community consensus if others don't mind (also see not exactly), but it ain't my flagon of tea. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 20:01, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
        I think that more than a week is heavily pushing it. SL93 (talk) 22:53, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
        An article that is two weeks old is not eligible for DYK unless it achives GA status. I see no consensus to ignore all rules. Flibirigit (talk) 00:22, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]