Jump to content

Urban decay: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

12 June 2016

4 June 2016

3 June 2016

29 May 2016

22 April 2016

26 March 2016

21 March 2016

12 February 2016

1 February 2016

28 January 2016

11 January 2016

21 December 2015

10 December 2015

20 November 2015

23 October 2015

17 October 2015

4 September 2015

17 August 2015

12 August 2015

4 August 2015

1 August 2015

  • curprev 03:0103:01, 1 August 201550.166.108.81 talk 21,866 bytes −178 To those worried about the Cato citation, don't. It's well supported in the econ literature. Rent control is something we understand really well. Sorry it doesn't jibe with your ideology. See Paul Krugman goo.gl/ITkqQ6 undo
  • curprev 02:4102:41, 1 August 201550.166.108.81 talk 22,044 bytes −93 Added "Proponents of rent controls argue that" to beginning of sentence asserting positive effects from rent control. The citation did not support the previous wording.Milton Friedman et al. asserts the opposite, that the presumed advantages do not result undo

31 July 2015

28 July 2015

28 June 2015

22 June 2015

9 June 2015

29 May 2015

12 May 2015

18 April 2015

29 March 2015

13 March 2015

6 March 2015

28 January 2015

16 January 2015

7 December 2014

14 November 2014

13 November 2014

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)