User talk:141.193.118.3

August 2019

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Quality control have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 18:35, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Email spam. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Email spam was changed by 141.193.118.3 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.91543 on 2019-08-13T14:50:33+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:50, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Equality Act 2006, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Equality Act 2006 was changed by 141.193.118.3 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953566 on 2019-08-15T14:11:20+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:11, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at New Hope High School (New Hope, Alabama). Gab4gab (talk) 13:50, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:17, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Dawes Act, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 20:05, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Favonian (talk) 16:39, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

September 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at University of Kentucky. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:11, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at George Eastman, you may be blocked from editing. Contributor321 (talk) 14:39, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Just Gettin' Started. Steve Quinn (talk) 19:43, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2020

Hello, I'm Aranya. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mycenae have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. – Aranya (talk) 19:17, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Chihuahuan Desert—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:31, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Marine biology. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. L293D (☎ • ✎) 17:05, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Hello, I'm SeoMac. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Transverse wave have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. SeoMac (talk) 20:34, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hooded crow

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--Quisqualis (talk) 22:14, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:34, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Taking Chances have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Taking Chances was changed by 141.193.118.3 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.859248 on 2021-03-05T15:48:49+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:48, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Who Framed Roger Rabbit. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Who Framed Roger Rabbit was changed by 141.193.118.3 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.987086 on 2021-03-05T20:07:05+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:07, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Who Framed Roger Rabbit have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Who Framed Roger Rabbit was changed by 141.193.118.3 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.9549 on 2021-03-08T19:35:47+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:35, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Get Lucky (Daft Punk song). Binksternet (talk) 15:43, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please Unblock Me, I Did Nothing Wrong

i was blocked for 5 years because they thought i was "vandalizing" pages for example Why Don't You Do Right first of all, the section i added WAS a notable version, since when was it vandalism to have the version from roger rabbit it's own section? if you unblock me i will add sources, but i had warned them to stop reverting my edits and now i'm blocked over this? please unblock me, i really did nothing wrong, i plead innocent.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rod Ponton

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BCuzwhynot (talk) 22:04, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your page has sucessfully been created. Congratulations!

Nomination of Rod Ponton for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rod Ponton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rod Ponton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Elli (talk | contribs) 00:10, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, i'm coming now Actually i can't because i'm blocked, but i have no relation to that user, i created the article because "cat lawyer" was viral at the time. i believe he deserved a page since Antoine Dodson had one, i really don't believe the article should be deleted.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.