User talk:69.15.12.66

This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks.
The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it.
March 2008 Hi, the recent edit you made to Anne Sullivan Macy has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Tiddly-Tom 18:33, 18 March 2008 (UTC) The recent edit you made to Anne Sullivan Macy constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. GtstrickyTalk or C 18:38, 18 March 2008 (UTC)) Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Cotton, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Elliskev 15:07, 19 March 2008 (UTC) Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Cotton. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Elliskev 15:08, 19 March 2008 (UTC) This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --Elliskev 15:11, 19 March 2008 (UTC) Your recent edit to Cotton (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 15:11, 19 March 2008 (UTC) You have been blocked for a period of 12 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Kralizec! (talk) 15:12, 19 March 2008 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. October 2008 Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to The Summoner's Prologue and Tale has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 14:38, 6 October 2008 (UTC) Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Potassium has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Closedmouth (talk) 14:16, 23 October 2008 (UTC) Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on Treehouse of Horror (series) worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. --♠Dspradau♠ 12:30, 31 October 2008 (UTC) November 2008 Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Scog (talk) 15:34, 3 November 2008 (UTC) Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Savoie, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Bettia (rawr!) 16:24, 6 November 2008 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings. Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Slipknot, you will be blocked from editing. Ceran →(sing→see →scribe) 16:33, 6 November 2008 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Vsmith (talk) 14:58, 14 November 2008 (UTC) December 2008 Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Christian Science has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Ndenison talk 16:44, 11 December 2008 (UTC) January 2009 Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on Tim O'Reilly worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. BarretBonden (talk) 18:18, 5 January 2009 (UTC) Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Savanna has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Jake WartenbergTalk 16:11, 14 January 2009 (UTC) February 2009 Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Google Earth, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Versus22 talk 18:54, 11 February 2009 (UTC) The recent edit you made to the page Google Earth constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Martin451 (talk) 18:55, 11 February 2009 (UTC) April 2009 Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Polyethylene, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Polyethylene was changed by 69.15.12.66 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-04-16T13:11:30+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 13:11, 16 April 2009 (UTC) November 2009 Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Mike Eaves has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. ♠The Ace of Spades(talk) 18:07, 6 November 2009 (UTC) Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Polytetrafluoroethylene. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 23:44, 6 November 2009 (UTC) Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Catapult, you will be blocked from editing. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 14:24, 16 November 2009 (UTC) This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Mangonel. Alansohn (talk) 16:15, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

January 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Web 2.0 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Jusdafax 15:25, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Web 2.0, you will be blocked from editing. NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:26, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

March 2010

This is the final warning you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Charles Lindbergh. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- The High Fin Sperm Whale 16:56, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Providence Christian Academy, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Providence Christian Academy was changed by 69.15.12.66 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2010-04-01T16:31:09+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 16:31, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Providence Christian Academy. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Mlpearc MESSAGE 16:34, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sam Hennings

The article Sam Hennings has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NACTOR, WP:ANYBIO, WP:GNG due to lack of non-trivial coverage in WP:RS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 09:07, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

---