Jump to content

User talk:82.149.40.13

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia![edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but you may want to consider creating an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (82.149.40.13) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! -- Rrburke (talk) 12:53, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to No. 1 Group RAF may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * [[RAF Lossiemouth]]: [[No. 1 Squadron RAF]|1]], [[No. 6 Squadron RAF|6]], [[No. 14 Squadron RAF|14]], [[No. 15 Squadron RAF|15(R)]] Squadrons
  • in north Lincolnshire, like [[RAF Swinderby]].<ref>Airfields of Lincolnshire - Patrick Otter - p15).</ref> Among others, No. 1 Group included [[No. 300 Polish Bomber Squadron]] and [[No. 301 Polish

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:42, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm VibeScepter. I noticed that you recently removed content from Peugeot 4008 without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. VibeScepter (talk) 17:28, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Peugeot 4008, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. VibeScepter (talk) 17:29, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018[edit]

Unexplained removal of information on Naval Group reverted. Please re-read the suggestions and advice above. Pdfpdf (talk) 12:25, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at SILF, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. — Smjg (talk) 13:31, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at SH-90. — Smjg (talk) 10:30, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Leonardo S.p.A.. --David Biddulph (talk) 11:55, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

82.149.40.13 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

there are legitimate users using this webhost, which should be blocked for unregistered users only Nicopedia 13:24, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This block is not currently affecting the user who applied.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 14:43, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Nicopedia: What is your interest in this matter? Unblock requests need to come from an affected party; there is no block on your username. 331dot (talk) 13:46, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@331dot: I tried to edit Wikipedia and I got a warning that stated that the IP address that you are currently using has been blocked because it is believed to be a web host provider or colocation provider. 82.149.40.13 is a shared IP address, used by many people, among which many registered users uninvolved with the problems that led to the IP block; I know that a IP block can be softened letting registered users escape the block: i think this could be the right choice for this situation. I'm of course editing this page from a different IP address, because it's impossibile to edit from 82.149.40.13.  Nicopedia 14:25, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nicopedia, you should file an unblock request from your account when you encounter that problem. You can edit your talk page under that circumstance. So, we will discuss this at that time and not worry about this IP now. If you find your IP is blocked then file your unblock request.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 14:42, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Berean Hunter: I'm going to follow your directions and use my own talk page to solve the problem, thanks. Anyway, I'd like to remark that the decline reason (this block is not currently affecting the user who applied) is wrong: the block is currently affecting me when trying to edit from 82.149.40.13.  Nicopedia 15:03, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Matthew hk (talk) 08:59, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2019[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Denisarona. Your recent edit(s) to the page Otto I, Holy Roman Emperor appears to have added incorrect information, so it has been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 14:33, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Otto I, Holy Roman Emperor. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 14:37, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm CAPTAIN MEDUSA. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to European Commission— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 15:30, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm HunMaster. An edit that you recently made to L3Harris Technologies seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! HunMaster (talk) 11:37, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Opel, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:06, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm BilCat. An edit that you recently made to British Aerospace ATP seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! BilCat (talk) 09:50, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2023[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at M2 Bradley, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Loafiewa (talk) 16:46, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to engage in subtle vandalism by making unexplained changes to information, as you did at The Looming Tower (miniseries), you may be blocked from editing. CastJared (talk) 14:49, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at South Tyrol, you may be blocked from editing. Denisarona (talk) 14:25, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Battle of El Guettar. Denisarona (talk) 14:27, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm BilCat. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, ThyssenKrupp, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 20:59, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.