User talk:99.250.78.122
Attention:
This WHOIS report. . In the event of persistent vandalism from this address, efforts may be made to contact them to report abuse. Contact information may be available in theIf you are editing from this IP address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. Sometimes, in response to vandalism, you may be temporarily unable to create an account. If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it may be possible for the owner of the IP to determine who was making contributions from this address at any given time. If you are the owner of this address responding to reports of inappropriate conduct from this address, you may find the contributions history and block log for this address helpful. Please feel free to contact any administrator who has blocked this address with questions (blocking admins will be listed in the block log). |
April 2019
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Widr (talk) 18:46, 8 April 2019 (UTC)- If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
October 2019
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Space heater has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Space heater was changed by 99.250.78.122 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.85227 on 2019-10-08T15:44:26+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:44, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Voyageurs have been disallowed by an edit filter because they did not appear constructive. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page, which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Also feel free to ask for assistance at the Help Desk whenever you like to. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 16:19, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Acadia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 16:19, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives/Reports, you may be blocked from editing. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 16:20, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Voyageurs. - Arjayay (talk) 16:21, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
January 2020
[edit]Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Burning of Washington—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 16:34, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Queenston Heights. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 16:38, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Burning of Washington. CLCStudent (talk) 16:38, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Drmies (talk) 16:44, 7 January 2020 (UTC)- If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
February 2020
[edit]Hello, I'm Chuka Chief. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Burning of Washington have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Chuka Chief (talk) 19:33, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Burning of Washington. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
- If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place
{{Help me}}
on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Burning of Washington was changed by 99.250.78.122 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.856062 on 2020-02-10T19:34:02+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:34, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Chuka Chief (talk) 19:35, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Burning of Washington. TK421bsod (talk) 19:36, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Your recent editing history at Burning of Washington shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Aasim 19:52, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |