User talk:Abootmoose

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Tiramisoo (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

I have no idea if you will read this, Abootmoose, but the edits you made to Capital punishment in Canada really need to be done better. The "reference" you included was vague, to say the least---a link to a list of links to opinion polls is just simply not a citation. Please take the time to do things right. CüRlyTüRkey^Talk_Contribs

Present decade listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Present decade. Since you had some involvement with the Present decade redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). — Arthur Rubin (talk) 05:35, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Current decade listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Current decade. Since you had some involvement with the Current decade redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). — Arthur Rubin (talk) 05:34, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Constitutional fundamentalism[edit]

Your entry was well written, the only problems are getting the sources up to Wikipedia standards. WP:RS, WP:CS and WP:style. I left comments on the talk page to help you out. The last source from the Daily Beast was considered acceptable as long as the contributor was a reliable journalist and he is a senior Newsweek journalist so thats fine. The second source needs neutral constitutional scholar and the first might be tolerable but sources that require ordinary users to log in are not generally acceptable. Learning the cite templates is easy once you rip open and edit a Good rated article. Look at the SOPA article references section and how they use <ref name="this is a source"/> then place the actual source in the reference section of the article. It's so much easy to maintain references that way. You'll get this down quickly and become a top editor in no time. ;) --Alatari (talk) 10:27, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. In Pacific temperate rain forest (WWF ecoregion), you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Ferns (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Post-80s, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Young adult (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Pretty Hate Machine, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you to seek consensus for certain edits. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 01:01, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Screamo, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Calabe 1992 05:23, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Emo. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Calabe 1992 05:33, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Year Without a Winter[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page that you created was tagged as a test page and has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Funnyfarmofdoom _{(talk to me)} 05:42, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited British Columbia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Beervana listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Beervana. Since you had some involvement with the Beervana redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Cptnono (talk) 17:01, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pseudorationalism[edit]

The article Pseudorationalism has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Definition about an uncommon term, referenced to dubious links

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. QueenCake (talk) 17:32, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Emo. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Also, please do not edit war Guerillero | My Talk 04:23, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2010s in music (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Drake and Feist

Dry sider (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Washington and Traditionalist

Pseudorationalism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Rational

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Tiramisoo (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Valfontis (talk) 14:42, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pseudorationalism for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pseudorationalism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pseudorationalism until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —Tom Morris (talk) 22:06, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Canadian regional nicknames[edit]

Category:Canadian regional nicknames, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 22:43, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Canadian border cities has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Canadian border cities, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 23:24, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]