User talk:AhdBhat

Welcome!

Hello, AhdBhat, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 00:24, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Pindi Bhattian

Hi, AhdBhat. Welcome to Wikipedia!

Good show on your second article. I did a bit of cleanup on your article as named, and it's been tagged for further work - owing to weirdness with the English language, there were some issues with the language that suggested that the battle had not happened in the past. Don't worry about it too much - it's an easy fix for a weird, complicated language that I don't fully understand even after speaking it natively for about four decades. =)

Cheers, and enjoy your stay.

--Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 05:29, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hi, Dennisthe2.

Thanks for the feedback for the second article that I have wrote. I will fix my grammar mistakes that I have made on the article. I appreciate the help very much. Thank you. AhdBhat (talk) 18:22, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

Hallo, and thanks for contributing to the encyclopedia.

Unfortunately some of your references don't work.

Looking at Mirza Nizamuddin, you've added a reference "{{sfnp|Gardens of Mughal Lahore|ps=19}}", but the {{sfnp}} template ("Shortened footnote with parentheses") only works if you also have a list of bibliographic references to which these footnotes can refer. I wonder whether you have copied the references from another article, though I can't see which one - the same inadequate references appear in your contributions Battle of Chiniot and Rehmat Khan Bhatti.

Please go back to these three articles and add more information so that the references are actually useful to readers. Thanks.

If you have copied text from any other Wikipedia article, please read Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and give due credit to the other editors who have done the work, as described there. Thanks. PamD 21:36, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Dulla Bhatti shows how the {{sfnp}} template works. A simpler solution would be to just use "ref" and "cite", as many editors do. Please see Wikipedia:Citing sources and Help:Referencing for beginners, as it looks as if you just don't understand how references work in the encyclopedia. There is a lot to learn about editing Wikipedia but it is an interesting journey. Happy Editing. PamD 21:46, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this is not a valid citation. What exactly are you trying to use as a source? Is it available on the web? If so, please just give a link to it here and I will try to fix the article. - Sitush (talk) 00:10, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, do you mean page 19 of this book? - Sitush (talk) 00:10, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi PamD, and Hi Sitush, I have made an article called Punjabi-Mughal War with well sourced sources, I have also made an Article called Battle of Pindi Bhattian. Both articles have been reviewed and set up to the standards. I understand why these two articles should be redirected when they are well sourced. I am a new user so I might have been using templates, but overall I believe that the artickes should stay.

Your citations do not work and in so far as I can figure out which sources you are using, they do not mention the subject matter in the way you are describing. You keep reverting myself and PamD, who are pretty experienced when it comes to Wikipedia. If you keep doing that without providing relevant sources and you will find yourself blocked or topic banned as per the notice below that you have already seen. - Sitush (talk) 09:32, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sitush, All those Sources are relevant and relate to the article. And It does not make sense to redirect the article. I am saying this again, please let my article run. Its my article and I have created it. It is completely wrong to redirect it.

Please be careful

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

- Sitush (talk) 07:09, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sitush, For the article about Rehmat Khan Bhatti, He is contributing to the history of Pakistan, then why did u remove. I removed the List of 16th century Indians because he was not an indian. And at that time the word "India" wasnt even used in 16th century India. The name came from the british.

Rehmat Khan Bhatti

Hi, Sitish. Rehmat Khan Bhatti is not a 16th century India because the real name of India at that time was Sirhind. It is history of Pakistani because logically he was born in Chiniot which is in Pakistan. AhdBhat (talk) 15:36, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Punjabi-Mughal War listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Punjabi-Mughal War. Since you had some involvement with the Punjabi-Mughal War redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. utcursch | talk 04:38, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Bhatti-Mughal War

Template:Bhatti-Mughal War has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Sitush (talk) 14:10, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jasrath Khokhar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punjabi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Khokhar Confederacy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Khokhar Confederacy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khokhar Confederacy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. regentspark (comment) 20:24, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Malik Tazi Bhat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punjabi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:35, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Shaikha Khokhar moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Shaikha Khokhar, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 18:33, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]