Jump to content

User talk:Allen4names/Archive 6

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6

The Signpost: 03 June 2015

The Signpost: 10 June 2015

The Signpost: 17 June 2015

The Signpost: 24 June 2015

The Signpost: 01 July 2015

The Signpost: 08 July 2015

The Signpost: 15 July 2015

The Signpost: 22 July 2015

The Signpost: 29 July 2015

The Signpost: 05 August 2015

The Signpost: 12 August 2015

The Signpost: 19 August 2015

The Signpost: 26 August 2015

The Signpost: 02 September 2015

The Signpost: 09 September 2015

The Signpost: 16 September 2015

The Signpost: 23 September 2015

Rure

I don't see why you think this is a stub, and I can't see anything on the talk page. There is quite a lot of content, and basically it's a list. Lists are in general not stubs.Rathfelder (talk) 09:04, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

@Rathfelder: You didn't see the boilerplate on the talk page? The Rure article is considered a stub because it is little more than a list with a reception section added. There is not "a lot of content" as you put it. Regards. – Allen4names (contributions) 00:52, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 September 2015

The Signpost: 07 October 2015

The Signpost: 14 October 2015

The Signpost: 21 October 2015

The Signpost: 28 October 2015

The Signpost: 04 November 2015

The Signpost: 11 November 2015

The Signpost: 18 November 2015

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 November 2015

The Signpost: 02 December 2015

The Signpost: 09 December 2015

The Signpost: 16 December 2015

The Signpost: 30 December 2015

The Signpost: 06 January 2016

The Signpost: 13 January 2016

The Signpost: 20 January 2016

The Signpost: 27 January 2016

The Signpost: 03 February 2016

The Signpost: 10 February 2016

The Signpost: 17 February 2016

The Signpost: 24 February 2016

The Signpost: 02 March 2016

The Signpost: 09 March 2016

The Signpost: 16 March 2016

The Signpost: 23 March 2016

The Signpost: 1 April 2016

The Signpost: 14 April 2016

The Signpost: 24 April 2016

The Signpost: 2 May 2016

Amefurashi

WP:OVERLINKING actually says "a link may be repeated in infoboxes" and infoboxes are collapsed by default in mobile so I did that on that basis. (I consider infoboxes as non-article content personally) Regardless, it's not that big of a deal. Happy editing :). Opencooper (talk) 05:37, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

@Opencooper: Omitting context when quoting text, as you have done here, is BS. Please keep this in mind. – Allen4names (contributions) 15:00, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
It doesn't really change the meaning. It's preceded by: "Generally, a link should appear only once in an article, but if helpful for readers..." and that second part is the caveat to the first which led into my quote. My whole point was the caveat. You've been an editor for six years, obviously you know the guidelines, so I just quoted the relevant portion for brevity, not to pull a fast one on you. Anyway I didn't contest the change and just wanted to explain why I did it, so it doesn't really matter if we have different interpretations on how to apply the MoS. Opencooper (talk) 15:21, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
@Opencooper: Conditional ("if") part does change the meaning of the text you quoted. Otherwise it would mean that you could add links in the infobox (etc.) whenever you liked. BTW are you using a different version of mobile view (ie. not substituting "en.m." for "en." in the URL)? The infobox does not appear collapsed to me. – Allen4names (contributions) 15:38, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Yeah, but like I said, you and I know the context and the quote includes the qualifier "may". Anyway, sorry I should have clarified, I meant in the mobile app. Here's an example for the the article Atlantic Puffin where the infobox is collapsed as "Quick Facts". Opencooper (talk) 16:05, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Okay. One last thing… not everyone uses Google Chrome/Chromium so you should avoid using the .webp image format for now. Regards. – Allen4names (contributions) 16:35, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Whoops, gotcha, didn't know the Google Play Store did that. Opencooper (talk) 05:31, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 May 2016

The Signpost: 28 May 2016

The Signpost: 05 June 2016

The Signpost: 15 June 2016

The Signpost: 04 July 2016

The Signpost: 21 July 2016

The Signpost: 04 August 2016

The Signpost: 18 August 2016

Rina Satō article

Hi, I was wondering if you'd like me to give the Rina Satō article the filmography overhaul as I have with other VAs using VADB and Doi references? It'll get rid of the rowspans for the years as it has most of the material sorted by release date. I did Megumi Toyoguchi's one recently. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 00:58, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

@AngusWOOF: Go ahead although you may want to just {{ping}} me on the articles talk page for something like this. – Allen4names (contributions) 02:15, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 September 2016

Nana Mizuki

I noted you have been working on the actress' article. By searching online, I found an interview from something called "The Last's Program Guide" where Mizuki expresses joy for being a main character in The Last: Naruto the Movie. Any idea what is The Last's Program Guide? Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 21:27, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

@Tintor2: Not anything you should not be able to figure out yourself ie. that it may be something distributed to those who saw the theatrical release. Regards. – Allen4names (contributions) 22:59, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Allen4names. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

S-CRY-ed‎

I've been wanting to clean up S-CRY-ed‎ but first things come first. I could very little reviews of the show. Can you help me find more reviews of the series so that I can expand its reception section? Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 17:30, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

@Tintor2: No. You will need to find someone who has the August 2003 issue of Newtype USA if you want access to that review. – Allen4names (contributions) 18:02, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Level 2 header for character lists

I always find that plot is heavily tied to characters, and is why I used level 3 headers in my articles; akin to how the plot often has links that list to the character articles. Is there a reason you changed my edit to level 2? DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 03:46, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

@DragonZero: I generally expect a character list to fall under a level two heading. BTW if it was not my edit to the Rozen Maiden article you may want to provide a diff. – Allen4names (contributions) 03:56, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Clarification on 'my edit'? Aside from that, there's no problem if I change it back to level 3 then is there, or do you wish to discuss this further? DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 04:02, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Go ahead DragonZero. Please leave a HTML comment just in case. – Allen4names (contributions) 04:05, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
What kind of comment? Are you talking about the comment which I assume is suggesting the adoption of a def list (MOS:DEFLIST)? DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 04:18, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
@DragonZero: I was thinking someting along the lines of "Do not change to a level two header without discussion." – Allen4names (contributions) 04:21, 31 March 2017 (UTC)