User talk:Bmv 1978
Welcome
[edit]Welcome!
Hello, Bmv 1978, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Aboutmovies (talk) 07:01, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Retro TV category
[edit]Hello... with respect to your recent addition of the "Retro TV" programming category, it has been deleted. Categories such as that are generally used only for the original network, not for rebroadcasters. (If we were to use categories for every network that had ever shown a series, it would quickly become unmanageable.) If Retro TV has created any original programming, then those shows would be appropriate for the category. Please feel free to ask me if you have any questions about this. Thanks again. --Ckatzchatspy 18:04, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
KWQC-TV/KWQC-DT
[edit]I just wanted to drop by to leave you a quick note that I've done the following:
- undone the redirect that you placed at KWQC-TV, thereby restoring the content that was there before
- placed a redirect from KWQC-DT to KWQC-TV, thereby removing the content that you added there
It appears that in creating the KWQC-DT article and redirecting KWQC-TV to it, you've performed what is known as a "cut-and-paste" move. This is a problem, as doing so means that the correct contribution history necessary for licensing purposes does not follow the content.
If you believe that an article is named incorrectly, then the correct way to rename it is to use the "move" tab at the top of the page. However, please note that this wouldn't be a correct action with regard to this article. Articles about television stations in the U.S. are named using their FCC-issued call sign. Despite the fact that this station is now broadcasting in digital, as all full-powered U.S. television stations are, the station's call sign has not changed — it is still KWQC-TV, and so the article needs to stay at that name.
You'll find that this is true for most U.S. stations; there are very few that have actually changed their call sign to use the '-DT' suffix. In the future, if you believe that a station has made this change, the FCC has a database search tool that you can use to confirm this. Mlaffs (talk) 19:42, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Naomi (Two and a Half Men)
[edit]I have nominated Naomi (Two and a Half Men), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naomi (Two and a Half Men). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Pedro thy master User talk:Pedro thy master 16:23, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Ronald Wiedermeier
[edit]I have nominated Ronald Wiedermeier, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ronald Wiedermeier. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Pedro thy master User talk:Pedro thy master 16:23, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Disambiguation pages
[edit]The disambiguation pages that you've been creating lately have been popping up on my watchlists. Just a few pointers, if you don't mind:
- entries on disambiguation pages should only have one bluelink per line. For example, if the article actually exists, then other items such as the city or state should not be linked. If the article hasn't been created yet (it's a redlink), then the city can be linked to provide context
- please add {{DisambigProject}} to the talk page
- disambiguation pages shouldn't have incoming links; the point of a disambiguation page is actually to make sure that links can be fixed to point to the right place. The exception would be if you were adding a hatnote to the top of the article that points to the disambiguation page, to indicate that other articles have also had that call sign. Otherwise, linking former callsigns in an infobox to the disambiguation page isn't necessary
- if there's only one other station that's shared a callsign, particularly if it used that station a long time ago, a disambiguation page isn't usually necessary. Again, in that case, it's often more easily handled using a hatnote
Hope you find this helpful. If you ever have questions, don't hesitate to ask — I've done a lot of work with this stuff. Mlaffs (talk) 17:43, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
Television station articles
[edit]Please stop reverting articles to previous versions which contained information that was redundant, erroneous, changed unnecessarily, or all of the above. I've reverted all of your recent changes (several NYC stations and WUSA (TV)) back, and will be watching you closely from hear on. Station Agent 836 (talk) 05:31, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
March 2012
[edit]This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 117Avenue (talk) 04:09, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Sarah Pavan
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Sarah Pavan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.huskers.com/ViewArticle.dbml?SPSID=14&SPID=23&DB_OEM_ID=100&ATCLID=69150&Q_SEASON=2007. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Osplace 02:18, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation pages redux
[edit]I thought your username was familiar when it started popping up on my watch list recently, and sure enough - I see that I've landed on your talk page before! :>)
Just to repeat a couple of points:
- when you're creating a disambiguation page over top of an article rename (like you did with KQCS), please add {{WikiProject Disambiguation}} to the talk page as well
- if there's only one other station that's shared a call sign (again, as with KQCS), a disambiguation page isn't usually necessary. It's often easier to use a hatnote instead
Again, if you ever have questions, don't hesitate to ask — I've done a lot of work with this stuff. Mlaffs (talk) 21:38, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of WQUA (disambiguation)
[edit]The article WQUA (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Unnecessary disambiguation per WP:TWODABS. WQUA is the primary topic and a hatnote navigates readers to WFXN (AM), bypassing the dab.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Tavix (talk) 15:47, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of KXEL (disambiguation)
[edit]The article KXEL (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- An unnecessary disambiguation per WP:TWODABS. A hatnote does the trick.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Tavix (talk) 20:59, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of WMWC (disambiguation)
[edit]The article WMWC (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- An unnecessary disambiguation per WP:TWODABS. A hatnote does the trick.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Tavix (talk) 21:02, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Bmv 1978. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Bmv 1978. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Ways to improve 2019 Chicago Cubs season
[edit]Hi, I'm Boleyn. Bmv 1978, thanks for creating 2019 Chicago Cubs season!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your references.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Boleyn (talk) 19:14, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Bmv 1978. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:IowaLicensePlate2018.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:IowaLicensePlate2018.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)