User talk:Bossming

September 2021[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Famigo. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Don't change the subject of articles to your own - Write your own article with it's own title see Wikipedia:Articles for creation for creating a draft KylieTastic (talk) 15:11, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bossming, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Bossming! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Famigo (September 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CptViraj were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Famigo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Famigo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CptViraj (talk) 09:13, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Famigo (Arizona company) has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Famigo (Arizona company). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:10, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Famigo (Arizona company) (October 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is written from the viewpoint of the company, focusing on what the company says about itself. Corporate notability is based on what independent reliable sources have written about the subject.

Not every business corporation is notable, and this draft does not establish corporate notability. You may ask for advice about corporate notability at the Teahouse.

This draft reads like an advertisement, but Wikipedia is not for advertising.

This draft has been resubmitted without any visible improvement, or with very little improvement. If you do not know what is needed to improve this draft, please ask for advice rather than making minor improvements and resubmitting.

You may ask for advice on how to improve this draft at the Teahouse or on the talk pages of any of the declining reviewers. (The declining reviewers may advise you to ask for advice at the Teahouse.)

If this draft is resubmitted without any improvement or with very little improvement again, it is likely to be rejected, and it may be nominated for deletion, or a topic-ban may even be requested against further submission by the responsible editor.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Famigo (Arizona company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Famigo (Arizona company), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:12, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Famigo (Arizona company) (October 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Famigo (Arizona company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Famigo (Arizona company), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 15:46, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Famigo (Arizona company) has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Famigo (Arizona company). Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 19:41, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing.[edit]

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Bossming, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Bossming|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 07:47, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Famigo (Arizona company)[edit]

Hello, Bossming. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Famigo (Arizona company), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Famigo (Arizona company)[edit]

Hello, Bossming. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Famigo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:42, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: FAMIGO (October 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asparagusus was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:FAMIGO and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Asparagusus (interaction) 21:59, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Asparagusus. Can you help me understand what in particular looks like advertisement? This is not the intent at all as we absolutely value Wikipedia's unbiased source of information and as much as I tried to follow the philosophy, seems like I need guidance and will appreciate.

As far as references, several are by top tier unbiased and non sponsored news paper articles from EL Nuevo Dia and El Nuevo Herald and I am not sure if since they are in Spanish, I hope not but I am afraid the reviewer not understanding them they might be disregarded as not as important.

I appreciate your guidance. Bossming (talk) 23:11, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bossming. First, I wasn't talking about the references; per WP:NONENG, non-English sources' merit aren't based on their languages (though I don't think I could properly gauge their reliability as I don't know much Spanish). The reason I declined your draft was because the prose seemed to have a bit of a promotional tone. Here's some examples:

"...to help independent artists, [and] influencers monetize their content."

This sentence feels somewhat promotional because of the word "help" as well as the list of their target demographics. This could be reworded to be something like "...as a monetization platform for musicians." This, however, may not work entirely, because of the confusing wording of the rest of the sentence. Something of the like, though, would.

"...under the guidance of CTO Tanmay Shahane..."

I would just cut this from the text. It is an unnecessary clause on its own, and it serves only to mention the CTO. It is (in my opinion) not important to the context of the sentence.

"The FAMIGO web-based marketplace allows the creator to sell single digital content, subscriptions, music, podcasts, shout outs[,] and anything digital."

This sentence seems promotional because of the word "allows"; this makes it feel as if the marketplace is very generous. It also feels promotional because of the list of its features (and especially the fact that it ends with "...and anything digital", which makes it sound exactly like an ad). One way to reword the sentence (if it's kept at all) would be, "FAMIGO also has a web-based marketplace for musicians." It also needs to be cited. (If you can't find a citation, then it's probably not worth mentioning in the article.)

"Since launch, Famigo has welcomed creators from multiple industries such as musicians Jowell, Randy, Ivy Queen, DJ Nelson, Cultura Profetica, Essene, Leen Beat, and other industries including master chefs Colombia Leo Cocinero, models, TV celebrities Darcey & Stacey Silva, and most recently sports & wellness, welcoming The Bone Collector and Colombia's soccer team, Atletico Nacional."

First, the two uses of "welcomes/welcoming": again like "allows". Too friendly-sounding; Wikipedia articles have to follow WP:NPOV. The second complaint is my real problem with this paragraph: it's just a bunch of WP:NAMEDROPPING. A list of notable people that use the service doesn't automatically make it WP:NOTABLE.

Thank you for working to get this WP:PAID article to follow guidelines. Hopefully this analysis helps. If I have time, I might go in and help with the prose of the draft, but I've already spent quite a bit of time writing this. Have a good day/night!

Asparagusus (interaction) Asparagusus (interaction) 00:25, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bossming! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Asparagusus (interaction) 21:59, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

wow, @Asparagusus, thank you so much on the feedback. I am working on the prose now. Thank you for the guidance. Bossming (talk) 16:37, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome!

Asparagusus (interaction) 16:48, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Asparagusus - I finished updating the company history. Thank you for your feedback. It looks more direct and specific to what I intended to write. I just needed guidance. Please let me know your thoughts and if the prose is reasonable. Best! Bossming (talk) 18:17, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Asparagusus - also, is it pending review? There is one declined submission and a an additional message "pending review". Bossming (talk) 18:22, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Famigo (entertainment company) has been accepted[edit]

Famigo (entertainment company), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Asparagusus (interaction) 21:00, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! I appreciate the help and guidance! Bossming (talk) 22:18, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]