User talk:CREG7898

Welcome!

Hello, CREG7898, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Rent Free (album), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! ASUKITE 23:00, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CREG7898, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi CREG7898! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

April 2021

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Eagles 24/7 (C) 15:01, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rent Free (album)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rent Free (album) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ASUKITE 22:58, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted images

One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:14, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Citing sources

Hi, I noticed that you don't cite your sources when you add content to articles. I've added a reference to a source for your edit on Myles Garrett for you. You might find User:Nick Moyes/Easier Referencing for Beginners helpful in learning how to cite your sources. Cheers! Schazjmd (talk) 14:31, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Odell Beckham. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Your edits are disruptive because you appear to be blindly reverting my edits without any reason and are not providing an edit summary, which is required for all reverts outside of vandalism. Rockchalk7 17 18:41, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Odell Beckham Jr., you may be blocked from editing. Rockchalk7 17 19:38, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you have an issue with my edits, please discuss the issue and stop reverting.--Rockchalk7 17 19:39, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are inexplicably removing sourced material and replacing it with your preferred unsourced version. If this continues, you will be blocked from editing. Please take your concerns to the article talk page and get consensus prior to restoring your edit.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:53, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop reverting without discussing the issue.--Rockchalk7 17 20:33, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:10, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please understand that this is a collaborative project and the expectation is that you communicate with your fellow editors. Your repeated unexplained reverts, coupled with a complete lack of response to concerns raised regarding your edits, played a significant role in my decision to block your account.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:16, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Odell Beckham Jr., you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Another revert without an explanation and I will request another block as your block just expired for exactly that, along with edit warring. Rockchalk7 17 03:35, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

1, You began reverting my edits first without explanations beginning with this edit. 2, you have continued to revert my edits without explanation 1 2 3 4 times, after which you were blocked. You then proceeded to revert again without explanation a mere hours after your block expired. You have no legitimate reason to be reverting my edits. I am requesting another block.--Rockchalk7 17 21:07, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CREG7898 Listen, Under no reason you should not be reverting Rockchalk717's edits, Let me explain to you if you do that again you will be blocked from editing again by an admin. Chip3004 (talk) 21:17, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Chip3004: I've already requested a block at WP:AIV since this editor has gone back to the same behaviors that led to a previous block within a few hours of the block expiring.--Rockchalk7 17 21:25, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Odell Beckham Jr.) for a period of 1 month for edit warring after a 72-hour block for the same behavior on the same page. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:04, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This time it was just a page block. Please remember after this block expires that reverts excluding ones removing vandalism require an edit summary. Please also remember that if you have an issue with an edit made by another editor, you are to discuss the issue either on the article talkpage or on the editor's talkpage.--Rockchalk7 17 22:16, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Mikehawk10. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Rockchalk717 with this edit that didn't seem very civil, so I removed it. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it’s one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 22:34, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Because of your personal attack,

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Rockchalk7 17 23:08, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly suggest to stop the personal attacks, or the block will turn to more than a page block. And yes, according to Wikipedia policies, you did do something wrong.--Rockchalk7 17 03:17, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 04:08, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]