User talk:Chadillaccc

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Chadillaccc, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 07:44, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Kitchener sky.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Kitchener sky.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:05, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AfD notices

Please don't remove AfD notices from articles, like you did here. It is not allowed. You are invited to join the discussion linked in the template instead, and to give arguments (preferably based on our policies and guidelines) why these articles should not be deleted. Fram (talk) 12:54, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this recent edit to List of tallest buildings in the Waterloo Regional Municipality, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Qwyrxian (talk) 12:55, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Follow up: If you think those articles shouldn't be deleted, go discuss why on the AfD discussion pages. Deleting those notices actually makes no difference in whether the article is deleted or not, because it's all based on the discussion at the AfD page. Those tags must stay up until the deletion discussion is finished in about 7 days, at which time an administrator will weight the opinions presented in the light of policy and decide whether or not there is a policy-matching consensus to delete. Qwyrxian (talk) 12:57, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chadillaccc. You have new messages at Qwyrxian's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Suggestion for List of tallest buildings in ... (city)

I have already added a Keep for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tallest buildings in St. John's, Newfoundland.

You cannot do a Wikipedia:Userfication while an AfD is pending, but you can make straight text copies of each article and save them in text files on your hard drive. I recognize that these articles were a lot of work, and now you are expected to defend many articles at one time by improving them. At least keep the articles offline for possible future use, should some or all of these articles be deleted in the near future. --DThomsen8 (talk) 02:08, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the Architecture and Canada templates to several of your lists, and I added a see also for List of tallest buildings in Abbotsford on the Abbotsford article. You should do likewise for the lists that I did not do. --DThomsen8 (talk) 02:32, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at List of tallest buildings in Edmonton, you may be blocked from editing. 117Avenue (talk) 13:15, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So, by vandalizing and "deliberately" introducing incorrect information, you mean, introducing correct information and adding to the factual accuracy of the page, right? Because there's nothing wrong with the edits I made. It is ridiculous to have buildings as short as 70 meters in a proposed buildings list, and also ridiculous to not include "Manulife 2" in the list, which you haven't.... even after you reverted my "fictitious" edit.

By the way, if you're going to be a moderator/administrator on a public, global encyclopedia, you might want to start talking to and treating people with respect. The way you referred to me as "deliberately introducing incorrect information" is preposterous, as the information isn't incorrect. Even if it was, it was an honest mistake at worst. It was just un-sourced just like most of the buildings currently on the list are. If you wouldn't mind then, maybe you could update the page and include some of the proposals made within the last 12 months?

Do not write on my talk page again unless you're going to be civil. That was insanely rude. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chadillaccc (talk • contribs) 03:41, 26 October 2011 (UTC) [reply]

You removed good references, and added unreferenced claims. If these are so obvious, why have you failed to cite them, on the article, or here trying to defend yourself? 117Avenue (talk) 04:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/2011_Vancouver_Island_earthquake

Hi, I see you have contributed to an article about earthquakes in Canada. Just wondering if you would like to contribute to this deletion nomination discussion? Ottawahitech (talk) 16:56, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited List of tallest buildings in Ontario, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Windsor and Hamilton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

Hi. When you recently edited Rapid transit in Canada, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victoria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

Hi. When you recently edited Rapid transit in Canada, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Waterloo, Kitchener and Evergreen Line (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Jim1138 (talk) 04:56, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of tallest buildings in the Halifax Regional Municipality, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dartmouth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Woodstock, Ontario, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Oxford County and European (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of central business districts, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Darwin and St. John's (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:15, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Telus Sky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Westbank (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Telus Sky Look up.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Telus Sky Look up.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:58, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Western Canada, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages West coast and Victoria. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:04, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Telus Sky Redesign.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Telus Sky Redesign.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:56, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Chadillaccc. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Chadillaccc. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Chadillaccc. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Brookfield Place Calgary.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Brookfield Place Calgary.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of tallest buildings in Victoria, British Columbia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of tallest buildings in Victoria, British Columbia, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tallest buildings in Victoria, British Columbia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of tallest buildings in Saguenay, Quebec for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of tallest buildings in Saguenay, Quebec is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tallest buildings in Saguenay, Quebec until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 08:57, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of tallest buildings in Thunder Bay for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of tallest buildings in Thunder Bay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tallest buildings in Thunder Bay until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 12:30, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of tallest buildings in Abbotsford, British Columbia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of tallest buildings in Abbotsford, British Columbia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tallest buildings in Abbotsford, British Columbia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 19:35, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]