Wikipedia's banning policy states that "Any edits made in defiance of a ban may be reverted to enforce the ban, regardless of the merits of the edits themselves. As the banned user is not authorized to make those edits, there is no need to discuss them prior to reversion."
It is now 27 September and Cody has failed to respond or stop making the disruptive or unproductive edits as other editors have repeatedly requested. I am upgrading the warning to a level 4 and plan to request that he be permanently blocked next week if he fails to change his behavior. - Jeremy (Jerem43 02:41, 28 September 2007 (UTC))[reply]
It is now 22 September and It appears that Cody took a week off starting on the 16th, however he starting to edit again and appears to be up to his old tricks. His recent contributions appear to be good faith edits but he continues his pattern of unjustified page moves, redundant entries and failing to cite his edits. I am going to monitor his edits and ask that other editors who find issues with his edit note it down. It may have to come down to issuing a level 4 warning. - Jeremy (Jerem43 00:08, 23 September 2007 (UTC))[reply]
I'm keeping an eye on him also. —tregoweth (talk) 15:45, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please read the following notice on your recent editorial behavior It is critical that you understand the serious nature of these warnings.
Based upon failure to respond to any of these requests and continuing your stated pattern of behavior, I am forced to tag your talk page with the following official level 4 warnings:
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.
This is your last warning. The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Based upon your behavior and failure to respond to several repeated attempts to contact you, I can only assume that your edits have been made in bad faith. I am sorry to have to do this, but myself and others have repeatedly asked you to stop and you have not. If by October 1, 2007 you have continued to make these edits, I will escalate these warnings to level 4im and request that you be permanently blocked from Wikipedia.
Level 1 – Assumes good faith. Generally includes "Welcome to Wikipedia" or some variant.
Level 2 – No faith assumption
Level 3 – Assumes bad faith; cease and desist
Level 4 – Assumes bad faith; strong cease and desist, last warning
Level 4im – Assumes bad faith; strong cease and desist, first and only warning
Based upon the repeated requests to cease an desist your unproductive edits, moves and additions to multiple articles, I am tagging your talk page with the following official warnings:
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Please stop. If you continue removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Please stop. If you continue to ignore our policies by introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia you will be blocked.
Based upon you behavior and failure to respond to several repeated attempts to contact you, I can only assume that your edits are not made in good faith as practiced on Wikipedia. I am sorry to have to do this, but myself and others have repeatedly asked you to stop and you have not. If by September 21, 2007 you have continued to make these edits, I will escalate these warnings to level 4.
Level 1 – Assumes good faith. Generally includes "Welcome to Wikipedia" or some variant.
Level 2 – No faith assumption
Level 3 – Assumes bad faith; cease and desist
Level 4 – Assumes bad faith; strong cease and desist, last warning
Level 4im – Assumes bad faith; strong cease and desist, first and only warning
Hello, Codyfinke6! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! LittleOldMe 17:13, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
In regards to your edit of the CBS Records article, the sentence is about the record 'label'. The earlier CBS Records label (which operated outside North America and issued records issued in North America on the Columbia label) is now called Columbia Records (except in Japan). The record 'company' is now called Sony/BMG which operates several record labels. Columbia Records' then parent CBS founded the CBS Records label which issued Columbia recordings outside North America. Read the Columbia Records article for more information.Steelbeard1 01:55, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on FoodSaver, by SLSB (talk·contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because FoodSaver is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting FoodSaver, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 15:16, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop adding this quote to the WNYW article. This slogan is no longer used on their newscasts, and it also has nothing to do with the meaning of the call letters. the WNYW call sign was a disambiguation of the previous calls, WNEW-TV, which needed to be changed when News Corp. purchased channel 5 in 1986. The slogan "What New Yorkers Watch" was implied to be derived from WNYW in the promos, but it was not the other way around.
Either way, stop adding this incorrect material to the article. Rollosmokes
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to WNYW. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Rollosmokes 15:27, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rollosmokes 15:37, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You continue to make the same incorrect edits to WNYW. You continue to evade discussion on your talk page. I have tried to reach out to you, and with nothing to show for it. You have left me no choice but to seek administrator assistance.
For the FINAL TIME, the call letters WNYW were solely a disambiguation from the former call letters WNEW-TV. They were not taken from the slogan "What New Yorkers Watch". Twenty years later, the slogan was derived from the call letters, NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND. Please stop adding this incorrect information. Rollosmokes 04:35, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Snakka, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Marasmusine 06:46, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Doris Biscoe, by Stormbay (talk·contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Doris Biscoe seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Doris Biscoe, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 16:53, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Farmer Jack, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Dave (Talk | contribs) 17:02, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A {{prod}} template has been added to the article American Journal, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. King of Hearts 18:24, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi - a stub template or category which you created has been nominated for deletion or renaming at Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion. The stub type, which was not proposed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, does not meet the standard requirements for a stub type, either through being incorrectly named, ambiguously scoped, or through failure to meet standards relating to the current stub hierarchy or likely size, as explained at Wikipedia:Stub. Please feel free to make any comments at WP:SFD regarding this stub type, and in future, please consider proposing new stub types first! Grutness...wha? 00:46, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to WNYW, you will be blocked from editing. Rollosmokes 02:11, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Dragnet (1954 film), by AA (talk·contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Dragnet (1954 film) is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Dragnet (1954 film), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 12:40, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm hopeful that the handful of improvements I've made to this article will satisfy the immediate concerns while acknowledging that this is an article in need of serious expansion. The simple fact that the single was a Billboard Hot 100 #1 in 1988 should be enough notability. - Dravecky 08:33, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
What's going on with WNYW? It looks like you keep re-adding the fact that WNYW stands for "What New Yorkers Watch". The station has had the WNYW call signs since 1986, probably long before the current slogan was created; stations call signs aren't usually assigned based on station slogans. Please remember that any content you add to Wikipedia should be verifiable, and if it can't be verified, it can be removed (and it has been, several times). You can respond here, or on my talk page, or on talk:WNYW. Best wishes and happy editing, Firsfron of Ronchester 09:19, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
And, as I told you, he doesn't respond to messages. He readded the slogan again to WNYW in this edit ([1]), and also readded the incorrect news branding at WABC-TV ([2]). I reverted those changes in both articles for the umpteenth time. Rollosmokes 17:57, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It is with great reluctance that I am blocking your account for 24 hours. It appears that some of the information that you have been adding to television station articles is false or incorrect. Repeated attempts to contact you have failed, and you continue to add this uncited, unverifiable information to the articles in a slow edit war. I can unblock your account, but I need to know that you are willing and able to communicate with other Wikipedia editors in the spirit of collaboration.
You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our polices concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Firsfron of Ronchester 09:30, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed on First Brands, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. WebHamster 16:19, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Flexsteel, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Flexsteel seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Flexsteel, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself.CSDWarnBot 20:08, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know if you were aware of this, but WLS-TV actually calls its newscasts "ABC7 News", and has not used the Eyewitness News name for about a decade. I've reverted your edit to WLS-TV as a result. --WCQuidditch☎✎ 16:19, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Roundelay-MF, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Roundelay-MF is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Roundelay-MF, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself.CSDWarnBot 14:08, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed on Ready Access requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DMacks 14:57, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:
Place {{hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
Make your case on the article's talk page.
Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. DMacks 15:00, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed on Ready Access requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
This is your last warning. The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Realkyhick 19:31, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You may have had a good reason to remove content from Dice Game (pricing game), but since you have not explained your edits after several requests that you do so, your actions may be construed as vandalism. Please be careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. TheHYPO 01:05, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Codyfinke6. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue that you may be involved with. You are free to comment at the discussion, but please remember to keep your comments within the bounds of the civility and "no personal attack" policies. Thank you.
You have repeatedly made unproductive edits, and I and others, have asked that you stop. You have been blocked once, and I am go to request that you be again, permanently.
Plesae don't create individual articles for CBS slogans; the currently existing article (List of CBS slogans) is sufficient. Thanks! —tregoweth (talk) 19:00, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed on Don Francisco Gourmet Coffee, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Bridgeplayer 23:58, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
When creating articles, please do more than write one sentence. The article should at least explain why something is important enough for an article ("Fictional Toy Company is the third largest toy manufacturer in the world," for example.) —tregoweth (talk) 18:39, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed on Billy Chinnock requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. WebHamster 21:12, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Also, please respond to messages you receive here and elsewhere; uncommunicative editors who make nonconstructive edits (as you do) tend to end up blocked from editing. —tregoweth (talk) 19:55, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Also, when an article has been deleted, do not re-create it, especially if it has already been deleted several times (i.e., Kids II). —tregoweth (talk) 19:57, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop creating articles of only one or two sentences, and re-creating deleted articles and redirects. —tregoweth (talk) 20:27, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm wondering whether it's a copyright violation. Are you quoting just a section of the song, or the whole song? How much of a song can one quote without violating copyright? Might it be better if you quote only a shorter section of the song? Or have the words been released under GFDL? --Coppertwig 17:39, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
As far as I'm aware, WLVI-TV does not call itself "The CW56"; it is simply "CW56". The station logo even omits the "The" in the CW logo. I've reverted your edit to WLVI-TV for this reason. Thank you for your understanding. --WCQuidditch☎✎ 19:21, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
"In association with" is a self-explanatory phrase; there is no need to create an article for it. Please stop creating frivolous or minor articles. If you have any questions or need any help, please let me know. Thanks. —tregoweth (talk) 01:39, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Also, you don't seem to be responding at all to any of the messages listed here. If you continue making nonconstructive edits and not interacting with others, you may be blocked from editing. —tregoweth (talk) 01:41, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It seems that you have a rather long history of adding very short, nearly contentless entries to this site.
You need to do more than a single, declaratory sentence. If you aren't willing to add a few good, solid sentences, then please don't add anything. OK? You're going to lose your edit privileges and it's unlikely you'll get them back once your account and IP are blocked. Just some unsolicited and friendly advice you'd do well to heed. Regards, --PMDrive1061 01:42, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
One more thing: This is supposed to be an interactive community site. That means you are encouraged to interact with those who may have concerns about your behavior. If you just go on your merry way and not respond to inquiries, you'll likely be blocked for good. Think about it before you go off and start doing the wrong thing. Have fun, but please play by the rules. Thank you. --PMDrive1061 01:46, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You have created several short articles and redirects about processed cheese food, an already existing subject (American cheese, Processed cheese). These articles are too short and do not need to exist. I will be nominated them for speedy AfD- Jeremy (Jerem43 19:41, 29 September 2007 (UTC))[reply]
I have blocked this account. You have a history of vandalism / inserting misinformation, and making generally useless edits without addressing any of the concerns raised. I can understand not wishing to communicate when not absolutely necessary, but some communication is necessary in a collaborative effort such as this project. You have not once, ever left an edit to any talk page, and this is troubling. If you are willing to at least address this concern, the block may be lifted. Until such time, your edits are causing consternation amongst your fellow editors and this needs to be stopped for the time being. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 23:21, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Smart Beat, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
Non-notable product, no evidence of notability given
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. B. Wolterding (talk) 10:38, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Smart Balance, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
Apparently a non-notable product. No evidence of notability given, and none added in more than one year.
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. B. Wolterding (talk) 16:40, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please read the following notice on your recent editorial behavior
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to WNYW. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Rollosmokes 15:27, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Farmer Jack, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Dave (Talk | contribs) 17:02, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
