User talk:Coolbruh123

Copy/pasting

You literally copy/pasted entire section from Soompi to Loveship, eveything was the same to the last word:

“Loveship” is a warm R&B song composed and lyricized by Paul Kim with vintage keyboard and tender string sounds that will unite beautifully with their harmonies. The song, which will be about the heart-fluttering feelings that passed by unnoticed from being friends for so long, is arranged by Joseph K, who arranged Paul Kim’s “Me After You,” “Traffic Light,” and more."
"Earlier, both Chungha and Paul Kim posted a black and white photo of the two in school uniforms, drawing curiosity about what could be coming from the two artists who are known to take over the music charts every time they release new music. On January 13, the two singers finally revealed information regarding collaboration they have been secretly working on since the end of last year."

So you better go and delete everything yourself if you did something similar in other articles before others find out or this will go to WP:ANI, alongside with your stupid "trolololo" and "LOL" edit summaries, not to mention several personal attacks. Snowflake91 (talk) 17:10, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

trolololol Coolbruh123 (talk) 04:45, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Hello, I'm Larry Hockett. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Loveship seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Larry Hockett (Talk) 04:51, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

One of your recent additions has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Larry Hockett (Talk) 05:03, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional material

Please let me know which other artists' pages have promotional external links in their Wikipedia articles so that I can go remove them. Or, you can remove those yourself. Thanks. JimKaatFan (talk) 18:14, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Im not too sure by though... sorry Coolbruh123 (talk) 10:45, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dazzle Dazzle

Hello Coolbruh123,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Dazzle Dazzle for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is significant enough to be included in an encyclopedia, and the artist doesn't have an article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 09:11, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Young Lions FC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scott Crichton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:12, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Images and copyright

Hi there. I noticed you've been adding/updating images in a few articles, however a some of the images I have looked at (those which popped up on my watchlist) seem to be copyright violations. For example, the image you updated at Bae Suzy was uploaded under a CC license, however the source provided (this video) does not state any licensing at all. Not all videos are uploaded with a license allowing re-use, and it's important to upload images under a correct and valid licence for their use. Please review the files you have uploaded to make sure their licensing is correct, and be more cautious with future uploads. Alex (talk) 07:01, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lee Ka-eun

Let's cut to the chase: if you revert this redirect against consensus one more time, I will report you for edit-warring. And there is no doubt as to how this will come out, given your behaviour. The standing consensus is that the subject does not meet required notability thresholds. This has been affirmed by no less than six editors who have reverted you, which should demonstrate to you that there is no "obvious notability" present at this point. What you need to do now is to convince those who oppose you that notability has clearly improved since the date of the last AfD. You do this by making convincing points on the talk page, not by trying to hammer through your approach with reversions and "bruhhh" comments.

(It's also not particularly smart to edit war against admins, because they don't even have to go through channels to get you to play nice, as I do.) --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 17:37, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 14:00, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:20, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This comment was pure trolling and clear evidence that you intend to continue edit warring against consensus. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:29, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yoon Jae-yong for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yoon Jae-yong is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yoon Jae-yong until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 13:30, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Coolbruh123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am certainly not Wadamz and have been wronged. For my actions at Lee Ka-eun, I admit that I was wrong. The reason I behaved that way is because I felt that Kaeun deserved much more love after watching her getting eliminated from Produce 48 due to the riggings. I admit that it was my fault and as a teen, I was being immature. I have noticed that Wadam has joined Wikipedia 8 years ago, however, I was barely even teen back then, I certainly will not have access to the Internet as a primary school kid. Moreover, how is it possible for Wadamz to have so many accounts when we probably have different IP address. I really hope you guys can unblock me as I am really wronged, and will be grateful and promise not to make such immature acts and mistakes again.

Decline reason:

Sockpuppetry was confirmed at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wadamz/Archive and is not in doubt. Yamla (talk) 10:44, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Coolbruh123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I really am not a sock puppet of Wadamz and really have only 1 account. I know im at fault for edit warring and I have accepted the block. However, I was wronged and am not a sock puppet. Im interested in Asian artists and therefore edited East Asian articles, but really am not a sock puppet like the other accounts. We probably have different IPs at different countries or part of the world, as I am sure this is the account I have. I really hope this account can be unblocked as I have created and edited alot of articles with it, and do not want to waste them all. I will cooperate and watch my behaviour, and also cooperate to prove that I’m not a sock puppet if needed. Thank You.

Decline reason:

Your IP and device have already been checked, and the abuse of multiple accounts is confirmed both technically and behaviourally. Yunshui ^雲 _水 07:56, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yunshui, hi, but what does it mean by my IP and device is checked technically though. Because I only have an account.

Pings don't work if you don't sign the post in the same edit as the ping.
You are still connecting from an IP even if you are using a named account. Check users can see non-public information about the account's edits., including that IP number, the browser that was used to make the edit, and the operating system of the computer. Meters (talk) 22:44, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Coolbruh123

Thank you for creating Loveship.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 01:16, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Adib Hakim

The article Adib Hakim has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Coverage found is weak and does not satisfy WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:03, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Korean-language singers of Macau

A tag has been placed on Category:Korean-language singers of Macau indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:07, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]