User talk:Cop77

Welcome!

Hello, Cop77, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Qaei ☎ 19:30, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of David Hyldkrogs algoritme for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Hyldkrogs algoritme is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Hyldkrogs algoritme until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Passengerpigeon (talk) 12:30, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cop77, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Cop77! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Samwalton9 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Your article David Hyldkrogs algoritme

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page David Hyldkrogs algoritme to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:53, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of David Hyldkrogs algoritme

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on David Hyldkrogs algoritme requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Largoplazo (talk) 19:37, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Cop77,

Thank you for contributing to the sum of all human knowledge.[1]

I believe that anything you can think of is on-topic somewhere.[2]

There are over 20,000 wiki.[3]

Any one particular wiki, such as the English Wikipedia, has to specialize in some narrow niche.

The Algorithmist wiki or GitHub or BitBucket are better places to post a new algorithm than the English Wikipedia.

Have you seen Wikibooks: Programming Languages/Concurrent Languages#Mutual Exclusion?

Have you tried asking the people at the Dansk Wikibooks or the Dansk Wikipedia if they know of a better place to post a new algorithm?

--DavidCary (talk) 16:18, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"I can see you don't feel like answering my question"

I have replied, in quite a bit of detail. To reiterate, you appear to have a fundamental misunderstanding of the purpose of Wikipedia, which is to redistribute material which has already been published in reliable sources. To allow original research would mean a fundamental restructuring of Wikipedia's basic principles, which is not going to happen. ‑ Iridescent 20:29, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI

Hello Cop77. I have removed your posting to WP:ANI as it is not appropriate there. Sorry that your edits have not been well received on the English Wikipedia, but we really do not have articles in Danish here. WP:DRV would be a venue where you could discuss the deletion of the article, but I must point out that there is no point in doing so if you are not prepared to write an article in English and explain why it is not original research.

Have you considered submitting articles to the Danish language Wikipedia instead? MPS1992 (talk) 20:39, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per my comment on your (MPS1992's) talkpage, I've restored your comment at WP:ANI and replied there. WP:DRV is the place to go to complain about a specific deletion, but if you want to raise concerns about the conduct of a specific admin, WP:ANI is the correct venue. ‑ Iridescent 20:45, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cop77, there has been a response to your post at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Welfare State ‖ 20:51, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cop77, you may want to avoid comments such as this, where you delete other comments and call editors unintelligent. That's not going to help anything, and continuing it can be seen as disruptive. Please be more careful. Thank you. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 20:55, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For your reference, here's a link to Danish Wikipedia, which hosts all articles in Danish. But note that they have a parallel guideline, Wikipedia:Pålidelige kilder, which means that you can't create articles there based on unpublished information—just like here at English Wikipedia. Ibadibam (talk) 22:29, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Your recent talk page comments on User talk:Passengerpigeon were not added to the bottom of the page. New discussion page messages and topics should always be added to the bottom. Your message may have been moved. In the future you can use the "New section" link in the top right. For more details see the talk page guidelines. Thank you. Passengerpigeon (talk) 22:33, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]