User talk:Copysan

vn-4

This user talk page has been vandalized 4 times.

Yak about/with me here all you want!

Best way to do this is to leave a topic at the end of the page. This is easiest done by clicking here. Thanks Jjjsixsix for giving me the idea for this.

I will reply here unless you request otherwise. Replies to my comments left on your talk page will be copy and pasted into here to preserve context.

Welcome!

It is automated:

Welcome!

Hello, Copysan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Jjjsixsix 03:50, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links

Actually, there's less links left on Distinguished Service Medal than when I finish a page (there's usually a few Talk, User talk, and the like), so it's done. I've moved the entry accordingly. TimBentley 04:07, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem

I think I updated your vandal count properly :) Tawker 22:56, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Racism

Please don't use the n word repeatedly -- Thanks aleg — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.58.253.114 (talk • contribs) 16:05, February 12, 2006

Please tell me where I've used the n-word? I would like to know. Copysan 23:45, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The page is gone now unfortunately to say. But just watch it in the futer. Thank you! :))

Since you cannot provide evidence where I have been using the n-word, I will assume that I am innocent of this charge. (If you want the page that had the alleged n-word usage, you can request its temporary reinstatement on WP:DRV.)

Also, please to ask why have you deleteing my posts on domain? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.58.253.114 (talk • contribs) 16:21, February 12, 2006

What posts/domain are you talking about? Copysan 00:39, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How can you speak for all of 63.204.151.5?

This question was posed by 134.58.253.114 (talk) on my user page, which Adrian and Peruvianllam reveted, since 134.58.253.114 posted this twice. [1] [2] I have moved this question here from my user page to my talk page because I feel 134.58.253.114 maybe, as a newbie, he does not know how Wikipedia operates. It's okay. I'll assume good faith. to 134.58.253.114, please post futher discussion here. Thank you. Copysan 00:37, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

First, I'd like to begin by thanking you for noticing the misspelling of category. It is much appreciated. Second, regarding your question. I feel I can speak for the ideals of the school that owns that IP, Bellarmine College Preparatory. I cannot speak for them all, but I can speak for the ideals because I am a representative of that school. Note that I do not say I speak for all of Bellarmine, but instead note that I directly cite the ideals. I apologized because that IP is representative of me, since that IP represents my school. I also edit from that IP without logging in, on occasion. As a result, what that IP does is a reflection of me. I feel that the vandalism perpetrated by that IP do not represent me and the ideals of that school accurately, and as a result, I posted that small blurb to reflect that. It's quite an odd line of reasoning. perhaps this will make it easier. If we hold 63.204.151.5 = Bellarmine = Me and 63.204.151.5 = Vandal, then by the Commutative Property, Vandal = Me. However, I am not a vandal, so a qualification must be made. The qualification modifies the original assumptions. It is now, 63.204.151.5 = Vandal (except for when 63.204.151.5 = Me). Hopefully, that cleared it up. Copysan 00:37, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What are your views on abortion

What are they? (Fixed also your spelling of know) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.58.253.114 (talk • contribs) 16:59, February 12, 2006

Abortion should be legal. Copysan 04:20, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Random note

Heh, yea. I don't mind a free Taiwan per se... but they make too big a deal of it IMO. But the PRC is where it is. All the economic growth is insane. I just don't like people who make a big deal about freeing Tibet/Hong Kong because they BENEFIT more from being part of the PRC than anything. And Taiwan is a de facto seperate state anyways so I don't know why the PRC makes such a big deal about that... meh, my two cents and a random raving on the political state of China. Sasquatch t|c 04:51, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for edit summary

Hi. I am a bot, and I am writing to you with a request. I would like to ask you, if possible, to use edit summaries a bit more often when you contribute. The reason an edit summary is important is because it allows your fellow contributors to understand what you changed; you can think of it as the "Subject:" line in an email. For your information, your current edit summary usage is 44% for major edits and 91% for minor edits. (Based on the last 150 major and 150 minor edits in the article namespace.)

This is just a suggestion, and I hope that I did not appear impolite. You do not need to reply to this message, but if you would like to give me feedback, you can do so at the feedback page. Thank you, and happy edits, Mathbot 04:16, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for the excellent A. H. Armstrong rewrite. It was positively wonderful. Your professionalism is extremely appreciated. You saved the article. LoveMonkey 15:12, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the compliment! P.S. That link did not show up, but it is located at A.H. Armstrong. Perhaps we should move it? Copysan 04:01, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah the same weirdness happened with the Vladimir Lossky article I submitted. It took like weeks for it to show up on a search. Still a killer job on your part though. Thanks again.LoveMonkey 03:57, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PS how does one add that beautiful LNC tag to their profile? Like the one YOU have? LoveMonkey 22:49, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

LNC tag? Copysan 03:24, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Libertarian Party-Libertarian National Committee. LoveMonkey 16:33, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Add this code to your user page

<div style="float:left;border:solid #6ef7a7 1px;margin:1px;">
{| cellspacing="0" style="width:238px;background:white;"
| style="width:45px;height:45px;background:#6ef7a7;text-align:center;font-size:14pt;" | '''LP'''
| style="font-size:8pt;padding:4pt;line-height:1.25em;" | This user is a member of the [[Libertarian Party (United States)|Libertarian Party]].
|}</div>

Copysan 22:57, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done! Thanks. LoveMonkey 02:42, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Charles E. Hill

Hello Copysan. Might I ask you to help me with another article I contributed? Charles E. Hill thank you again Mr CopySan. LoveMonkey 13:11, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CopySan ya breakin my heart man..That text carries no copyright. LoveMonkey 23:12, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

True fair enough, sorry CS. LoveMonkey 02:06, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I hope your not mad at me over than. Hey no hard feelings aye. LoveMonkey 01:05, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia_talk:Censorship

A watered-down version of the proposed policy against censorship is now open for voting. Will you kindly review the policy and make your opinions known? Thank you very much. Loom91 12:22, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bellarmine swim team

Bellarmine swim team has lost meets every year...They have not lost a CCS title for some time. Talk to Larry Rogers and he will tell you there is no streak. So with that said it is not necessary to mention Campolindo at all. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.154.184.66 (talk • contribs). moved from user page by Jjjsixsix ^(t)/_(c) @ 04:25, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, then no streak was broken. The mercury news article is quite an odd one, then, for asserting that. Thank you for your quick and prompt reply. And thanks to Jjjsixsix for moving it from my User page to my Talk page. Copysan 04:30, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bellarmine President

Paul G. Sheridan is the new BCP president. William Muller served as interim president and was replaced this January. Here is a link: [3] —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.154.184.66 (talk • contribs) 13:08, April 25, 2006.

Youre right. I must be stoned. Excuse me. Also, please sign your comments by using ~~~~ Also found this which is what I'm putting on as a link under it. Copysan 23:02, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Carmelo Borg Pisani

see message Talk:Carmelo Borg Pisani#Comment on Copysan's edits, cheers --Joelemaltais 23:24, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

gotcha Copysan 01:52, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Academy Award Best Picture Template

Full conversation with responses from both parties copied into a chronological order can be viewed at User_talk:Copysan/Academy Award Best Picture Template Copysan 10:19, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am using Explorer in browsing and editing wikipedia articles. And I'm not having any problems which you have mentioned. The view through the Explorer, strangely, is similar to the image you posted with the correction (without the , despite actually having it). Further, I applied the s so that the year will not be separated from the appropriate title. So in terms of reconciling the appearance from Explorer and Mozilla Firefox, I am not really familiar since I just learned how to make and edit templates for a little over a month now. But your point is valid, an editor also once asked whether there was an error in a template I made before since it looks weird using Mozilla. Joey80 09:12, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, how about using instead of . The function is more encompassing than the simple . I previewed the page using this and the appearance in unaltered in Explorer, how does it look through Mozilla? Joey80 05:39, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, so it didn't do any good. Maybe we can post the problem in the help section so we can find a way to reconcile the format between Explorer and Mozilla. Joey80 07:56, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done! Posted it in under the technical section. In any case, I asked for possible suggestions to be directed to you since I don't use Mozilla and don't have it. Feel free to edit the template. Joey80 08:26, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good in Explorer too! Joey80 03:10, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism rollback

No probs! Cheers -- Samir धर्म 07:19, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re : EnRich!

Yup, that's right. And mark it as Template:nowcommons afterwards. Thanks for your interest in helping out on the WikiProject! :) - Cheers, Mailer Diablo 09:56, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Niko Lossky

Hey can you help clean up the page? LoveMonkey 23:36, 10 August 2006 (UTC) Copysan is THE MAN! You rule thanks! LoveMonkey 16:42, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Postcrossing

Hi there

I invite you to put this userbox on your userpage !

File:Ee337.JPG

This user is addicted to Postcrossing.

Just click edit this page to see the code for it ! Happy Postcrossing! Swollib 11:16, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NO thanks! Copysan 22:15, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Disambiguation Talk Request

This is a form message being sent to all WikiProject Disambiguation participants. I may have found your page based on your contributions or your link repair user box on your user page. If you are not a member, please consider including your name on the project page. I recently left a proposed banner idea on the WikiProject Disambiguation talk page and I would appreciate any input you could provide. Before it can be approved or denied, I would prefer a lot of feedback from multiple participants in the project. So if you have the time please join in the discussion to help improve the WikiProject. Keep up the good work in link repair and thanks for your time. Nehrams2020 22:48, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of the Daily Show guests AFD

As a contributor of these lists you may wish to vote: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of The Daily Show guests (2nd nomination). Cburnett 01:02, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help!

You seem good at making articles! I would appreciate it if you would help me become a better Wikipedian. Please respond on my talk page. Emprovision 23:02, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SHA-1

User:Hairchrm/sha1 - Hairchrm 02:37, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pink Taco (Manhattan) newspaper citations

Hi Copysan, I put the citations at Talk:Pink Taco. Couldn't find any of the national ones, just a random few from the Manhattan Mercury (I say 'random' because, of the ~2 dozen I have that I clipped and saved from the Mercury, the 6 that are still in their archives seem to be randomly chosen, and certainly don't represent the juiciest or most important). Anyway, I make some suggestions there about cutting down the article to conform it to what's available online. Jameswsperman 23:37, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Love Smart

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Love Smart, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Postcard Cathy 21:55, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you keep removing Anton Ford from Bellarmine notables?

What do you mean "unanswered claims to notability"? You never answered my question, which was "Who says winning a speech competition at the national level two years in a row isn't notable?". That was my answer, what's your response, other than to roll it back? I even provided a footnote wit a reference. If someone is noted 15 years after they graduate as first in the country 2 years in a row in something, how is that not notable? Would appreciate a response.

please see Talk:Bellarmine_College_Preparatory#Notability_of_Anton_Ford

Sorry about that, it was me who posted that , and I forgot to log in. Please see my additions to the Bellarmine Talk page. Spectrum266 19:38, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Jesusism

An editor has nominated Jesusism, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesusism (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. . -- Pastordavid 19:25, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

Hi Copysan, just a quick note to let you know that I've added the Rollback tool to your account. You might find it helpful to read through the page at Wikipedia:Rollback if you haven't already, and feel free to let me know if you have any questions or there are any problems with it. Remember, most importantly, it's only for edits that obviously need reverting - everything else should have an edit summary attached —αlεx•mullεr 09:18, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Defence of Liechenstein

Have you thought of finding the relevant person at the CIA who deals with the 'L' entries for the World Fact Book and advising them that they've got it wrong? They'd probably be keen to fix the error. Buckshot06 (talk) 03:02, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've emailed them the day I made the edit and so far have received no reply. Copysan (talk) 04:32, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, email inquiries to large organisations never seem to get anywhere - small embassies seem to react better! If I was nearby (I'm in New Zealand), this is how I'd approach it - ring the CIA main front desk, ask for the section which deals with the World Fact Book, then in that section, ask for the person who is specifically responsible for Liechenstein, find out that person's name, and then email him or her. Otherwise it's more difficult. My 2 cents, for what it's worth. Buckshot06 (talk) 22:34, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:FutureWeaponsS02E07.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:FutureWeaponsS02E07.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:24, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:ApocalypticaCover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ApocalypticaCover.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 06:05, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you remove the Raines fact???

Curious. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Smith288 (talk • contribs) 01:39, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As you can see by this diff, I simply removed extraneous brackets from an external link. I believe you may have confused my edits with somebody else's. Copysan (talk) 06:18, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of material from Luis von Ahn

You removed a section claiming it was unsourced. Considering that Luis von Ahn posted the 'rankmaniac' assignment on the university's web server, it's pretty clear that he actually gave this assignment, and if you google 'rankmaniac', you can see the results. —Preceding unsigned comment added by CMUalum (talk • contribs) 12:54, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There's no source claiming it's a controversy. You can't call something a controversy unless it really is. Generally controversies involve at least a couple news articles and maybe an editorial or two. There's no evidence that the Rankmaniac assignment or the honeypot webserver generated any controversy or extended discussion outside of class or had larger ramifications on professor or student conduct policies. Copysan (talk) 20:29, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why this was controvertial ought to be rather obvious, and if you search the web you will find some not very favorable things written about von Ahn and the rankmaniac incident. I don't know if it resulted in changes to professor or student conduct policies, but I never claimed that it did. If you consider 'controversy' a weasel word then perhaps you'd like to suggest a better term, but the article is rather incomplete without a discussion of these incidents, as it portrays him as some sort of spam-fighting hero, while the reality is a bit different. CMUalum (talk) 07:05, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to see such "not very favorable things" written in verifiable, credible, and notable sources. Wikipedia is not the place for unsourced controversies, especially on articles about living persons. Copysan (talk) 07:38, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that those kinds of personal attacks do not belong on Wikipedia. I think it's sufficient to explain what happened and leave it at that. CMUalum (talk) 17:19, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Only if what happened is notable and verifiable. Not only are these two incidents not verifiable, but also, in most instances, Wikipedia does not mention other professors' homework assignments so I see no notability reason to mention the Rankmaniac assignment or the honeypot webserver here. Copysan (talk) 17:47, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Other professors don't deliberately try to get their homework assignments ranked highly on Google. This was a highly unusual thing to give as a homework assignment, and I've never heard of anyone else doing anything similar at any other university. That's what makes it notable. CMUalum (talk) 20:34, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism List

What's the deal man, I vandalized your page a bunch of times and I don't get recognition in your vandalism tracker? Mrheadhappyday (talk) 03:08, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Can I steal your stuff?

I was thinking of creaing an essay page called "Jimbo is always right" or something similar (yes, I did steal the idea from your userpage). I was wondering if I could ~~steal~~ acquire some of that little rant you have about Jimbo on your userpage to use in the article. The beauty of the article is, that if Jimbo disagrees and says that he is not always right, then that will probably be made policy, but then he said that he's not so it...well I can't really describe it, but you know what I mean. Sorry if you don't understand what I'm talking about. I'm not trying to dis Jimbo or anything, it will probably be more pro-Jimbo than anti-Jimbo. Spongefrog, (talk to me, or else) 14:01, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, I just saw WP:JIMBOSAID. Spongefrog, (talk to me, or else) 14:10, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:DFBHD.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:DFBHD.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:03, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kcnl2.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kcnl2.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:19, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ch1049toRomantica.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ch1049toRomantica.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:31, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Enamorada.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Enamorada.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:31, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of No Cussing Club

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is No Cussing Club. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No Cussing Club (3rd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:06, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CSIS06E05.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CSIS06E05.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:35, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CSIS06E21.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CSIS06E21.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:40, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CSIS06E01.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CSIS06E01.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:40, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CSIS06E22.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CSIS06E22.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:42, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CSIS06E02.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CSIS06E02.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:44, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CSIS04E05.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CSIS04E05.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:50, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CSI-721.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CSI-721.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:35, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HouseS03E21.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HouseS03E21.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:48, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CSIS07E19.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CSIS07E19.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:51, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:HouseOfSandPoster.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:HouseOfSandPoster.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:53, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PresentationHSSeal.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PresentationHSSeal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:42, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AmericanDadS02E18.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AmericanDadS02E18.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:54, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:GreatLiesToTellSmallKids.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:GreatLiesToTellSmallKids.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:09, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link fixing one-day contest

I have decided to put on a mini-contest within the November 2013 monthly disambiguation contest, on Saturday, November 23 (UTC). I will personally give a $20 Amazon.com gift card to the disambiguator who fixes the most links on that server-day (see the project page for details on scoring points). Since we are not geared up to do an automated count for that day, at 00:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC) (which is 7:00 PM on November 22, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the project page leaderboard. I will presume that anyone who is not already listed on the leaderboard has precisely nine edits. At 01:00, 24 November 2013 (UTC) (8:00 PM on November 23, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the leaderboard at that time (the extra hour is to give the board time to update), and I will determine from that who our winner is. I will credit links fixed by turning a WP:DABCONCEPT page into an article, but you'll have to let me know me that you did so. Here's to a fun contest. Note that according to the Daily Disambig, we currently have under 256,000 disambiguation links to be fixed. If everyone in the disambiguation link fixers category were to fix 500 links, we would have them all done - so aim high! Cheers! bd2412 T 02:09, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CannedAir.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CannedAir.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 23:35, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PresentationHSSeal.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PresentationHSSeal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:31, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ChattahoocheeFilm.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ChattahoocheeFilm.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:33, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PreyAloneScreen.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PreyAloneScreen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Prey Alone

The article Prey Alone has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails the film notability criteria - not enough coverage from reliable film sources. The best source is this, but it's a pretty narrow audience, and there's nothing else to substantiate notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 06:53, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PreyAlone.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PreyAlone.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SimpsonsS18E18.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SimpsonsS18E18.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:39, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LoveHellOrRight.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LoveHellOrRight.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]