User talk:CoralPinkBaby

Welcome!

Hello, CoralPinkBaby, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 21:02, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What's with the messages?

I've reverted your edits to María Ángela Holguín. In large part, the "Message" section you added to the article didn't add anything to the article: it wasn't clear what it was about, didn't clearly relate to the subject, and cited no reliable sources. —C.Fred (talk) 21:02, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

CoralPinkBaby, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi CoralPinkBaby! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:08, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at María Ángela Holguín. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. DMacks (talk) 01:38, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Can't Slow Down (Lionel Richie album), have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 17:50, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Black Ink Crew

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Falkirks^Talk 05:45, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm Dusti. An edit you recently made to María Ángela Holguín seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 01:08, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

María Ángela Holguín

Please stop adding unsourced non-neutral material to this article. Wikipedia has a strict policy on biographies of living persons, which you must follow. Editing here is a privilege, not a right, and continued disruption of this nature will lead to a review of your editing rights and a possible block. Thank you for your attention. Philg88 ^♦talk 08:00, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at María Ángela Holguín. Philg88 ^♦talk 07:26, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Falcon8765. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to María Ángela Holguín— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Falcon8765 ^(TALK) 21:23, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at María Ángela Holguín with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Tony Tan⁹⁸ · talk 21:25, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Philg88 ^♦talk 07:46, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Girls Just Want to Have Fun may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{{DEFAULTSORT:Girls Just Want to Have Fun}]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:24, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Company B (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pop. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Hello, I'm Haminoon. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Sweet Dreams (Are Made of This) with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Haminoon (talk) 06:54, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at This Time I Know It's for Real, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 09:09, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Tutelary. I noticed that you recently removed some content from She Works Hard for the Money (song) with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Tutelary (talk) 20:29, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Dance-pop singles

Category:Dance-pop singles, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Richhoncho (talk) 20:19, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 18 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Shannon (singer) page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:14, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries are required

Hello CoralPinkBaby: Upon reviewing your User contributions, you routinely do not provide edit summaries when editing Wikipedia pages. Please see WP:UNRESPONSIVE, which is part of Wikipedia's Editing policy, which explains the importance of using edit summaries. Also see WP:FIES, where it states "It is considered good practice to provide a summary for every edit..." (et al.). In the future, please use edit summaries to provide a proper summary of the edits you perform. Thank you. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:07, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

I noticed that you recently removed some content from Template:Fast-food chains of the United States without explaining why. Your edit also rendered the template into a dysfunctional state. Please refrain from such edits that render pages dysfunctional. Also, in the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:53, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Template:Fast-food chains of the United States, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. - Mr X 03:01, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Our House (Madness song). Please stop removing material from articles, including categories, genres, and template entries without providing an edit summary explaining these edits. - Mr X 03:15, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for persistent vandalism. Instead of contributing constructively, you have continued to vandalize Wikipedia content after several warnings. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:12, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue to indiscriminately remove content from Wikipedia articles, and furthermore without providing an edit summary explaining your edits, as you did at I Think We're Alone Now, you will be blocked again. You have been warned. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:07, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Dreamin' of Love, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:15, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at He Was Really Sayin' Somethin', you may be blocked from editing. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:18, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain your contributions using an edit summary. Changing information on Wikipedia (such as numbers and dates) without explanation may be confused with vandalism. Thank you. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:20, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 18:38, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]