User talk:Cricobr

Hello Cricobr, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of Contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.
Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
Article Wizard — a Wizard to help you create articles

The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.
Guide to Wikipedia — A thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia.

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.

Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Cricobr, good luck, and have fun. --MDesjardinss (talk) 19:14, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(MDesjardinss (talk) 19:14, 24 December 2009 (UTC))[reply]

December 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User:Cricobr/Spencer Beebe, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: User:Cricobr/Spencer Beebe was moved to Spencer Beebe by Cricobr (u) (t) redirecting article to non-existant page on 2009-12-29T15:03:05+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 15:03, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Palaces in Poland

Hello, I've answered to you on my talk page.--Krótki (talk) 23:12, 29 April 2010 (UTC) And again.--Krótki (talk) 09:02, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to User talk:Wehwalt has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Reaper Eternal (talk) 03:32, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Martín Ignacio de Loyola, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Canaries (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nippon Budokan may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "<>"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:16, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nippon Budokan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page This Is Us (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:08, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nippon Budokan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page At Budokan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:14, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pages are _collaborative_ creations; 'ownership' is considered a violation of Wikipedia's principles

I am well aware of Wikipedia's policy of non-ownership, thank you very much. I'd like to point out the reccomendation Bold, Revert Discuss to you. I'm sorry if my revert hurt your feelings, but I see it as totally unnecessary to complicate the table with another column labled "Summary", when that was what was intended in the "Description" column, and the information you wish to add can easily be added there. If you like, the Description title can be replaced with Summary. Also, some of what you put is redundant: when the Crew column says "None", that clearly means the mission was unmanned. For AS-203, the description given conveys specific information about the flight, to which "equipment test" doesn't add anything. The remaining value-added words can easily be added to the Descrition fields. JustinTime55 (talk) 19:55, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gates of Alexander

I've reverted you here. Besides the fact that we generally deprecate the use of "although" and would never start a lead with it or discuss a redirect in the lead, your edits seem to be original ressearch. You mention "two overlapping notions" - your sources need to discuss the overlap, you can't use sources that don't mention an overlap to build an argument for an overlap. Dougweller (talk) 15:12, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of T. F. O. Rippingham

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on T. F. O. Rippingham requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.buildingsofireland.ie/niah/search.jsp?type=record&county=SC&regno=11213029. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 17:54, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]