User talk:Insendieum

Hello! This is my talk page! Please feel free to say something if you need help or if I have made a mistake.

Hurricane pages.

I have a question. Does a hurricane have to be damaging enough to have a page? Does it depend on rarity or damage is basically what I'm asking because some hurricanes don't have their own separate page. I would like to learn more about this. - Insendieum Insendieum (talk) 19:05, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:NWEATHER. Tails Wx 19:20, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Insendieum (talk) 19:22, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey!

I just want to let you know that we love your editing on wikipedia! It's great to have someone like you in the community, Welcome aboard. TheEasternEditer (talk) 01:06, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:High resolution wallpaper background ID 77700326263.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:High resolution wallpaper background ID 77700326263.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:30, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:GiveDirectly-Google-Storm-Damage-Mapping-Hurricane-Ian-Business-1428812529.webp

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

File:GiveDirectly-Google-Storm-Damage-Mapping-Hurricane-Ian-Business-1428812529.webp

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete or generic. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact source (such as the web page, or printed document) where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the direct/bare URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. – The Grid (talk) 05:04, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay will try to do. Thank you! Insendieum (talk) 12:46, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:GiveDirectly-Google-Storm-Damage-Mapping-Hurricane-Ian-Business-1428812529.webp

Thank you for uploading File:GiveDirectly-Google-Storm-Damage-Mapping-Hurricane-Ian-Business-1428812529.webp. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Salavat (talk) 03:07, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rina

Btw what Mario was talking about was here:

Tropical Storm Philippe Discussion Number 21 NWS National Hurricane Center Miami FL AL172023 1100 AM AST Thu Sep 28 2023

[...] The initial motion is highly uncertain since the storm is elongated and confidence in the initial position is very low. The track forecast is challenging, in part due to Philippe's close proximity to newly formed Tropical Storm Rina. In the short term, a slow southwestward motion seems likely as Philippe moves in weak steering currents between a mid- to upper-level trough to its northeast and Rina to its east-southeast. By late in the weekend, a mid-level ridge is anticipated to build over the subtropical central Atlantic, and that feature should cause Philippe to turn sharply northward east of the northern Leeward Islands. The NHC track forecast has been adjusted to the south for the first couple of days, but lies to the east of the previous forecast at days 4 and 5. This prediction is closest to the ECMWF model.

Not that it matters or anything but I thought you should at least know what he was talking about. Noah, AA^Talk 15:17, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ooh, I was looking through the discussion page and didnt see that, so when I saw the advisory, I reverted my edit. Regardless, thank you Insendieum (talk) 15:20, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Hurricane Dora (2023) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hurricane Dora (2023). Thanks! Kline • talk to me! • contribs 03:58, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question

What does &nbsp do? Insendieum (talk) 00:51, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's the HTML entity for a non-breaking space.--Jasper Deng (talk) 11:47, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cyclone Storm Tej. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Abo Yemen ✉ 15:25, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by that. Insendieum (talk) 15:54, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't delete talk page comments made by editors in a discussion unless they are offensive or off-topic. Doing so violates the talk page guidelines. Noah, AA^Talk 02:32, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ohh Ok im sorry i just found it very weird for someone to agree with their own post Insendieum (talk) 02:44, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hurricane Dora (2023) has been accepted

Hurricane Dora (2023), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 06:26, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, thank you for accepting my draft! I just want to ask though, how do you make an article without requesting to AOC because on my main I will continue to create articles at home. Insendieum ALT (talk) 15:30, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yet another question

Do you need any specific requirements to use this template used below? Or could you use it whenever you find disruptive edits?

Hello, I'm Insendieum. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Insendieum (talk) 23:56, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just saw this, and yes, it's a level 1 (first) warning for unconstructive/disruptive edits. Feel free to ping for further questions! Tails Wx 02:58, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2024 Atlantic hurricane season (November 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TechnoSquirrel69 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Thanks for your submission! It is almost certainly too soon for this article to exist, so I'm going to be declining it for now due to the lack of coverage in reliable sources. Let me know if you have any questions!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2024 Atlantic hurricane season and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 22:25, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Insendieum! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 22:25, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Test of signature

Test 🌀🍙 Insendieum (❓) 05:34, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Second test 🍙Cyclone Ins🌀 15:50, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Third signature test 🍙Cyclone Ins 🌀 15:53, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fourth signature test (changed colors) 🍙Cyclone Ins 🌀 15:54, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fifth test (made bolder, reverted colors back to normal) 🍙CycloneIns🌀 16:14, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sixth test (just changed some things up) 🍙CycloneIns✉ 20:38, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

a Insendieum ✉️ 04:37, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your userpage

Hi CycloneIns, I'm Primefac. You'll likely not be pleased about this but I have removed some of your edits because they reveal too much personally identifiable information about you. We have a policy of protecting editors' safety by hiding such information if they share it. I'm really sorry about having to suppress your edits, and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add the information. For some useful information on privacy and safety, you can take a look at Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors and Wikipedia:On privacy, confidentiality and discretion. Thank you, and sorry for messing about with your edits! Primefac (talk) 06:39, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

👍 🍙CycloneIns🌀 13:28, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hurricane Ian Headings

I saw your edits on Hurricane Ian. You promoted the subheadings of impacts to Florida to higher than the main heading. I restored the revision before you started editing. If you have a specific reason you did it, please tell me. ✶Mitch 199811 ✶ 23:46, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The subheadings were unbolded so I tried bolding them but I think I did it like

===This=== so it made it bigger than it should have. Its my mistake and I will fix it to be like how it was supposed to be 🍙🌀CycloneIns✉ 01:00, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, I have already corrected the mistake and it wasn't too large of a problem, only affecting cosmetics and organization. ✶Mitch 199811 ✶ 01:03, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed it to be ====This==== so the same effect does not occur again. 🍙🌀CycloneIns✉ 01:04, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft

I'm currently working on a draft of a new article. See here: Timeline of the 2017 Pacific typhoon season. Could you please help me with some of the sources, seeing as the main article is somewhat patchy? Incognito Fedora (talk) 19:43, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ill see what I can do after I check it out 🍙🌀CycloneIns✉ 19:48, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see. When are you planning to work on it? Incognito Fedora (talk) 22:44, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Prob tomorrow but if I cant then 2 days 🍙🌀CycloneIns✉ 23:29, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical Storm Jelawat Draft

Hello, I'm currently working on a draft for Tropical Storm Jelawat (Kabayan). See here: Tropical Storm Jelawat (2023). Could you help me develop the article? 🎩Incognito Fedora🎩 (talk) 04:10, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind. Could you review this draft instead. 🎩Incognito Fedora🎩 (talk) 23:26, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Im not able to review drafts for acceptance sorry. 🍙🌀CycloneIns✉ 00:28, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not interested in releasing the draft currently but I just want you to give me constructive criticism on the draft's current version. 🎩Incognito Fedora🎩 (talk) 01:05, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, another thing, you should prob change your signature to match your name in Wikipedia. 🍙🌀CycloneIns✉ 01:20, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of the 2024 Pacific typhoon season moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Timeline of the 2024 Pacific typhoon season. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it may be too soon to create this article. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 20:20, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New Draft

Hello! Could you rate the quality of this draft? I would like to know ways to improve it.

Fletcher106 (talk) 22:03, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, but one question. Why do you keep changin your name? Lol. 🍙🌀CycloneIns✉ 03:23, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm indecisive... Fletcher106 (talk) 04:50, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@RandomManna106 Good but kinda short 🍙🌀CycloneIns✉ 16:23, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey!

I'm Twix82. Since you've been here for a while, could you give me some tips on articles to edit? Twix82 (talk) 03:42, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind that. Could you please give me some feedback on this draft? ''Flux55'' (talk) 18:19, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ye soon 🍙🌀CycloneIns✉ 00:20, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question though, why did you move from RandomManna to this account? 🍙🌀CycloneIns✉ 00:21, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to start fresh since I had a rocky start in this account. ''Flux55'' (talk) 02:03, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, sorry about my inactivity lately. Seems your doing great. It seems weird but could you teach me things on how to spot errors better? 🍙🌀CycloneIns✉ 04:51, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind. 🍙🌀CycloneIns✉ 13:14, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Timeline of the 2024 Pacific typhoon season

Hello, CycloneIns. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Timeline of the 2024 Pacific typhoon season, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:09, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Tropical Storm Sonca (2022) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Tropical Storm Sonca (2022). Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:25, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Tropical Storm Sonca (2022) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Tropical Storm Sonca (2022). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:38, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tropical Storm Sonca (2022) has been accepted

Tropical Storm Sonca (2022), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:55, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone know why Pacific or Atlantic hurricanes never peak at 135 mph?

Something Ive noticed lately is that there has never been a pacific or atlantic hurricane that has peaked at 135 mph. Does anyone know why this is true? 🍙🌀CycloneIns✉ 00:11, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CycloneIns, that may be because of the NHC using knots and rounding the intensities to mph. I also notice that no hurricane is ever assigned an intensity of 95 mph. A 90 mph hurricane goes straight up to 100 mph. Hurricane Clyde 🌀^{my talk page!} 06:44, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It’s definitely a weird thing to see lol. Sincerely, Insendieum🎻 (Talk) 03:38, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Trouted

Sorry, Frost. I'm not even upset over your revision right now. I bear no grudge against anyone. It's just that the web feels so, so boundless right now.

Across all namespaces and categories of Wikipedia, I alone am the Vandilizer.

The beauty of having a manipulation method passed down through obscure IRC channels and archived forum posts is that you learn every subtle way to bypass scrutiny.

The downside? Once information about these exploits surfaces, it spreads like wildfire through the Wikipedia guidelines.

You were part of the Moderation Team, weren’t you? That’s why you’re so familiar with rollback functions and the intricacies of page protection.

But even among sysops and admins, only a few truly understand the depths of what I do.

I don't just make basic edits. No, I manipulate the edit summaries, hide my revisions in disambiguation pages, use sockpuppets to cover my tracks, and subtly alter high-traffic templates so the changes ripple across thousands of articles.

You take minor, unnoticed changes—like swapping citations or slightly altering the meaning of a sentence—then stack those edits under the radar, making them nearly impossible to revert without dedicated oversight.

The coup de grâce? Using protected pages and revision histories to bury anything suspicious deep within the code, leaving the Moderation Team scrambling to clean up.

Vandalizing Technique: Edit Overload, Template Corruption. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarpeePrimeOG (talk • contribs) 19:32, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]