User talk:DaJerm

Welcome!

Hello, DaJerm, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
Simplified Manual of Style
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard is warmly recommended)
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Ask questions at Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
And feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Happy editing! — Sam Sailor 19:01, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Are you ready for editing?

The

Adventure

Hi DaJerm!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. Hope to see you there!

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered by — Sam Sailor 19:01, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:GulfQuest Maritime Museum, from its old location at User:DaJerm/GulfQuest Maritime Museum. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. — Sam Sailor 19:01, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Maritime Museum

Hi, can you please change some of the wording in your draft to avoid copyviolation as shown here [1] thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 04:17, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up! I have since changed the wording around. Let me know if there's anything else that needs to be done with it. Thanks! DaJerm

Your submission at Articles for creation: GulfQuest Maritime Museum has been accepted

GulfQuest Maritime Museum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Atlantic306 (talk) 23:36, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DaJerm. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Mini Ladd, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Thuresson (talk) 22:11, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Commons

Hi DaJerm,

Please check your Commons talk page, thanks :) Saucy^{[talk – contribs]} 03:44, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Logo for Octopie.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Logo for Octopie.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:39, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Octopie

The article Octopie has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:NCORP, the best available sources are routine entertainment press and clickbait-y post-2013 Newsweek, which has recently been demoted from general reliability at WP:RSP.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 00:30, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Octopie for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Octopie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Octopie until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:46, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jeffrey Scott Edell

Hi, Can I ask where you sourced the content for the article Jeffrey Scott Edell from? It contains specific details which don't appear in online sources e.g. the full names of his three children and size of his comic collection etc. --Pontificalibus 14:13, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oof! I forgot to cite that. I got that information from an online college bulletin. Let me go back and cite that. --DaJerm (talk) 18:13, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jeffrey Scott Edell for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeffrey Scott Edell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeffrey Scott Edell until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Pontificalibus 07:01, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo for Octopie.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo for Octopie.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:33, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Lahna Turner

Hello, DaJerm

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Citrivescence and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Lahna Turner, should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lahna Turner.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Citrivescence}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Citrivescence (talk) 00:36, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Citrivescence: Hi Citrivescence, thanks for reaching out. I'll work on making improvements to the page now. --DaJerm (talk) 00:05, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jeffrey Scott Edell for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeffrey Scott Edell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeffrey Scott Edell (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. scope_creep^Talk 21:53, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]